💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship November Batch
Talk to Mentor

Type: Explained

These Newscards correspond to the explained section of various newspapers. They become immensely important for both prelims and mains and special attention needs to be paid to them

Bills/Act/LawsDOMREthicsExplainedHistorical SitesIndia MappingIOCRop-ed snapPIBPrelims OnlySC JudgementsSchemesSpeciesStatesWorld Mapping

Port Infrastructure and Shipping Industry – Sagarmala Project, SDC, CEZ, etc.

India’s recent maritime reforms need course correction

Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

Introduction

India’s maritime laws, some over a century old, were recently overhauled through the Ports Bill, Merchant Shipping Act, Coastal Shipping Act, and Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill (2025). The reforms aim to modernise governance, boost ease of doing business, and enhance India’s maritime role. Yet, concerns remain over centralisation, weakened ownership safeguards, excessive discretion, and burdens on smaller players, raising questions about federal balance.

Why Is This News Significant

The Ports Bill, 2025 centralises decision-making under a Maritime State Development Council, curbing State autonomy in port development. The Merchant Shipping Act allows partial foreign ownership of Indian-flagged vessels, ending the earlier full Indian ownership rule. Critics argue these changes favour big corporations and the Centre, while sidelining coastal States and small operators, with implications for India’s maritime sovereignty.

Progress and Pitfalls of Maritime Modernisation

  1. Comprehensive reform: New laws collectively update fragmented, outdated frameworks, covering shipping finance, offshore operations, safety, liability, and training.
  2. Ease of business: The Ports Act aims to create coherence in regulation, promoting sustainable development and investment.
  3. Legislative haste: Bills passed without serious debate or standing committee review, raising concerns about lack of consensus and scrutiny.

The Ports Act and the Federal Balance

  1. Centralisation of authority: Maritime State Development Council empowers the Centre to dictate State maritime policies.
  2. Erosion of fiscal autonomy: Coastal States cannot adjust frameworks independently; central plans like Sagarmala and Gati Shakti override local priorities.
  3. Federal subordination: Critics argue this undermines cooperative federalism, reducing States to implementers of central schemes.

Eroding Safeguards in Shipping Ownership

  1. Loophole in Indian-flag ownership: Merchant Shipping Act allows partial foreign/OCI ownership; exact thresholds left to government discretion.
  2. Risk of flag-of-convenience: Executive may dilute ownership norms, letting foreign operators control Indian ships indefinitely.
  3. BBCD mechanism: Bareboat Charter-Cum-Demise leasing recognised, but risks foreign lessors retaining de facto control.

Small Operators and Dispute Resolution Challenges

  1. Vague compliance norms: Discretionary powers could overwhelm smaller port operators with compliance burdens.
  2. Clause 17 controversy: Bars civil courts from port-related disputes; relies on internal committees lacking impartiality.
  3. Investment deterrence: Absence of independent judicial oversight could erode investor confidence.

Coastal Shipping: Protecting or Undermining Local Players?

  1. Cabotage protection: Only Indian-flagged vessels can engage in coastal trade — in principle, safeguarding domestic players.
  2. DG Shipping’s sweeping powers: Licences to foreign vessels on broad grounds like “national security” or “strategic alignment.”
  3. Impact on fishing industry: Smaller players face heavy reporting burdens without clarity on data use or safeguards.
  4. Central dominance: National Coastal and Inland Shipping Strategic Plan reduces State-level say in coastal regulation.

Conclusion

India’s maritime reforms are necessary but flawed. The package risks over-centralisation, weakened sovereignty, and burdens on smaller operators, even as it promises modernisation. True reform requires transparent ownership rules, impartial dispute resolution, and genuine cooperative federalism. Otherwise, the reforms may deliver short-term ease of business but compromise India’s federal balance and maritime security.

Value Addition

Key Provisions of the Indian Ports Bill, 2025 (replacing Indian Ports Act, 1908)

  1. State Maritime Boards:
    • Statutory recognition: Boards set up by coastal States now have a legal mandate.
    • Functions: Planning & developing port infrastructure, granting licenses, fixing tariffs, ensuring compliance with safety, security, and environmental norms.
  2. Maritime State Development Council (MSDC):
    • Composition: Chaired by Union Minister of Ports, Shipping and Waterways; includes State Ministers, Navy & Coast Guard representatives, and Union Ministry officials.
    • Role: Issues guidelines on port data, ensures tariff transparency, advises Centre on national maritime plans, legislative adequacy, and connectivity.
  3. Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC):
    • Jurisdiction: Resolves disputes between non-major ports, concessionaires, users, and service providers.
    • Appeals: Lie with High Courts; civil courts barred.
    • Flexibility: Agreements may allow arbitration or alternative dispute resolution.
  4. Tariffs:
    • Major Ports: Fixed by Board of Major Port Authority/Company Board.
    • Non-Major Ports: Fixed by State Maritime Boards or their concessionaires.
  5. Port Officers:
    • Conservator: Chief port officer with powers over anchoring, berthing, movement, obstruction clearance, and fee recovery.
    • New functions: Preventing disease spread, assessing damage, adjudicating penalties.
  6. Safety and Environmental Protection:
    • MARPOL & Ballast Water Management Convention compliance mandatory.
    • New obligations: Waste reception facilities, emergency preparedness, pollution containment, and regular central audits.
  7. Offences and Penalties:
    • Continuity: Retains offences under 1908 Act (non-compliance, impeding navigation, damage to port property).
    • Decriminalisation: Certain offences now carry monetary fines; first-time violations can be compounded.
  8. New offences:
    • Imprisonment up to 6 months for endangering vessel safety, disturbing seabed.
    • Monetary penalties for unnotified port operations, failure to report/manage pollution, or ignoring DRC orders.

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2022] What are the maritime security challenges in India? Discuss the organisational, technical and procedural initiatives taken to improve maritime security.

Linkage: India’s maritime reforms (2025) strengthen security through MARPOL compliance, waste management, and statutory State Maritime Boards, but also create vulnerabilities. Dilution of vessel ownership, centralisation via MSDC, and weak dispute resolution raise concerns of sovereignty and resilience. Thus, reforms reflect both organisational advances and new security risks, linking directly to India’s maritime security challenges.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Minority Issues – SC, ST, Dalits, OBC, Reservations, etc.

Should reservations exceed the 50% cap?

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Laws, Institutions & Bodies Constituted For The Vulnerable Sections

Introduction

Reservations have always stood at the crossroads of social justice and equality of opportunity in India. While Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India empower the state to address historical discrimination, the judicially imposed 50% cap has often clashed with demands for greater inclusivity. Recent developments, from Maharashtra’s acceptance of Maratha demands to calls for caste census and creamy layer reform, have amplified questions on whether the reservation system remains equitable, representative, and sustainable.

The Current Moment of Reckoning

The debate has reached a critical juncture because:

  1. Political promises like Bihar opposition leader Tejashwi Yadav’s proposal for 85% reservations directly challenge the 50% ceiling.
  2. Judicial scrutiny continues, with the Supreme Court questioning whether creamy layer exclusion should extend to SCs and STs.
  3. Empirical concerns such as 40–50% of reserved seats remaining unfilled, and the Rohini Commission’s revelation that 97% of OBC benefits are cornered by 25% castes, highlight structural inequities.

This combination of political assertion, judicial intervention, and social critique makes the issue highly consequential.

Articles 15 and 16: The constitutional basis of equality and reservation

  1. Equality mandate: Article 15 guarantees equality in state actions, including education; Article 16 guarantees equality in public employment.
  2. Special provisions: Both allow the state to make reservations for OBCs, SCs, and STs.
  3. Present levels: At the central level, reservations stand at 59.5% (OBC – 27%, SC – 15%, ST – 7.5%, EWS – 10%).

Judicial rulings on reservation and equality

  1. Balaji vs State of Mysore (1962): Reservations must be “within reasonable limits” and capped at 50%; seen as upholding formal equality.
  2. N.M. Thomas (1975): Saw reservations as a continuation of equality of opportunity (substantive equality), but gave no ruling on the cap.
  3. Indra Sawhney (1992): Upheld 27% OBC quota, reaffirmed 50% ceiling, and introduced creamy layer exclusion for OBCs.
  4. Janhit Abhiyan (2022): Validated 10% EWS quota; held that 50% limit applies only to backward classes.
  5. Davinder Singh (2024): Suggested considering creamy layer exclusion for SCs and STs.

Challenges to the 50% ceiling on reservations

  1. Population logic: Backward classes form a larger share than reflected in current quotas; caste census demanded to get exact numbers.
  2. Unfilled vacancies: 40–50% of reserved seats for OBC/SC/ST remain unfilled at the central level.
  3. Sub-caste concentration: Rohini Commission showed extreme skew in OBC benefits—about 1,000 communities have zero representation.

The problem of concentration of reservation benefits

  1. OBCs: 97% benefits go to ~25% sub-castes.
  2. SCs/STs: Similar skew; absence of creamy layer exclusion means relatively better-off sub-castes capture opportunities.
  3. Policy vacuum: Despite judicial nudges, the Centre reaffirmed in August 2024 that creamy layer does not apply to SC/ST.

The way forward for India’s reservation system

  1. Balancing equality: Increasing quota to 85% may violate equality of opportunity, but substantive equality demands better targeting.
  2. Caste census 2027: Could offer empirical basis for restructured reservation.
  3. Sub-categorisation: Rohini Commission’s recommendations need urgent implementation.
  4. Two-tier system: Priority for the most marginalised within SC/STs could prevent elite capture.
  5. Beyond reservation: Skill development and private sector opportunities are crucial, given shrinking public jobs.

Conclusion

India’s reservation policy is at an inflection point. Expanding quotas without reforming their structure risks perpetuating inequity within communities. A nuanced approach, backed by caste census data, sub-categorisation, and skill-building, can ensure that reservations remain a tool for empowerment rather than a political slogan. The challenge lies in balancing constitutional guarantees of equality with the imperative of social justice in a diverse democracy.

PYQ Relevance:

[UPSC 2019] Performance of welfare schemes that are implemented for vulnerable sections is not so effective due to absence of their awareness and active involvement at all stages of policy process, Discuss.

Linkage: The 2019 question highlights how welfare schemes for vulnerable sections often fail due to lack of awareness and skewed access. The same issue is reflected in India’s reservation policy: despite constitutional backing, 40–50% of reserved seats remain unfilled, and the Rohini Commission revealed that 97% of OBC benefits are cornered by just 25% sub-castes, leaving nearly 1,000 communities with no representation at all. This shows that affirmative action, much like welfare schemes, risks becoming ineffective unless equitable distribution, sub-categorisation, awareness generation, and active participation of the most marginalised are ensured.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Policy Wise: India’s Power Sector

Decoding the SC order on regulatory assets

Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

Introduction

India’s electricity sector faces a chronic mismatch between the cost of supply and the revenue collected, leaving distribution companies (DISCOMs) financially stressed. To bridge this gap, regulatory assets, unrecovered costs deferred for future recovery, have become common. The Supreme Court has now ordered DISCOMs and regulators to clear these within strict timelines and capped their creation, marking a crucial step towards financial discipline and consumer protection in the power sector.

Significance of the Supreme Court’s Directive

The Supreme Court directed State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) and DISCOMs to clear existing regulatory assets within four years and any new ones within three years, while capping their creation at 3% of Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR). The Court also mandated transparent recovery roadmaps and intensive audits for non-compliant DISCOMs.The judgment is significant because it marks the first time the Supreme Court has set explicit timelines and caps for the liquidation of regulatory assets. With Delhi DISCOMs alone carrying regulatory assets worth over ₹58,000 crore, and Tamil Nadu reporting ₹89,375 crore in FY 2021-22, the scale of the problem is massive. The ruling highlights how the misuse of regulatory assets has become systemic, leading to debt accumulation, delayed payments to generators, and poor grid modernisation.

Understanding Regulatory Assets

  1. Definition: Regulatory assets are deferred costs created when the Average Cost of Supply (ACS) is higher than the ARR, allowing DISCOMs to recover the gap later instead of burdening consumers immediately.
  2. Example: If ACS = ₹7.20/unit and ARR = ₹7.00/unit, the shortfall of ₹0.20 per unit across 10 billion units leads to a revenue gap of ₹2,000 crore, which becomes a regulatory asset.
  3. Consumer relief: Prevents immediate tariff shocks but leads to deferred steep tariff hikes later, often with interest.

Causes of the Average Cost of Supply (ACS)- Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR) Gap

  1. Non-cost reflective tariffs: Tariffs often kept artificially low for political reasons.
  2. Delayed subsidies: State governments fail to release subsidies for agriculture or low-income households on time, worsening DISCOM finances.
  3. Fuel price shocks: Sudden increases in coal/gas prices inflate procurement costs.
  4. Historical evidence: Punjab’s 2004–05 case of ₹487 crore revenue gap set the precedent for regulatory assets in India.

Impact of regulatory assets on consumers and DISCOMs

  1. Consumers:
    • Immediate stability in tariffs but eventual steeper hikes.
    • Example: Delhi DISCOMs must recover ₹16,580 crore annually in four years, implying an additional ₹5.5/unit on average.
  2. DISCOMs:
    • Persistent cash flow crises as revenue doesn’t cover costs.
    • Forced to borrow → higher debt burden.
    • Limited capacity to modernise grids, integrate renewables, or improve services.
    • Creates a vicious cycle of financial and operational distress.

Regulatory Assets and Grid Modernisation

  1. Yes: Large unrecovered costs reduce capital available for investment in infrastructure.
  2. Renewable integration challenge: Financially weak DISCOMs are unable to invest in flexible grids or storage solutions.
  3. Consumer service compromise: Lower quality of supply, billing inefficiencies, and lack of digital modernisation.

Way forward

  1. Cost-reflective tariffs: Rationalise tariffs while shielding vulnerable consumers with targeted subsidies.
  2. Timely subsidy release: State governments must ensure fiscal discipline.
  3. Automatic fuel cost adjustments: Tariffs should respond dynamically to input cost fluctuations.
  4. Annual true-up exercises: Prevent backlog accumulation by reconciling projections with actual costs.
  5. Regulatory discipline: Enforce caps, transparency, and timelines to ensure regulatory assets remain exceptional, not structural.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s directive signals a turning point for India’s power sector. It underlines the urgent need for financial discipline, timely subsidies, and transparent tariff setting. If implemented well, this move could break the cycle of deferred costs and inefficiencies, ensuring that electricity supply remains both affordable for consumers and financially viable for utilities. For policymakers, it serves as a reminder that delaying reforms through regulatory tools only compounds systemic risks.

Value Addition

Importance of DISCOMs in India’s Power Sector

  1. DISCOMs are the last-mile link in the electricity chain, responsible for delivering power to households, industries, and agriculture.
  2. Their financial health directly impacts energy access, affordability, and quality of supply.

Current Financial Stress

  1. AT&C Losses: Aggregate Technical & Commercial losses remain high at ~16–20% (against a target of 12–15%).
  2. Revenue Gap: ACS > ARR leads to losses per unit supplied.
  3. Debt Burden: Many DISCOMs rely on borrowing to bridge gaps, adding to systemic financial stress.

Key Causes of DISCOM Distress

  1. Non-cost reflective tariffs: Political pressure keeps tariffs lower than actual supply cost.
  2. Delayed subsidies: State governments often delay releasing agricultural/poor household subsidies.
  3. Cross-subsidisation: Industrial and commercial consumers are charged higher rates to subsidise other sectors, affecting competitiveness.
  4. Fuel price volatility: Sudden spikes in coal/gas prices worsen procurement costs.

Government Initiatives for DISCOMs

  1. UDAY (2015): Transferred debt to State governments, targeted efficiency improvements.
  2. Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (RDSS) (2021): RDSS, focuses on smart meters, loss reduction, and IT-based monitoring.
  3. Electricity Amendment Bill (2022) (proposed): Aims to promote competition, allow multiple distributors in the same area, and reduce monopolies.

DISCOMs and Energy Transition

  1. Financially weak DISCOMs struggle to integrate renewable energy and invest in smart grids, storage, and modernisation.
  2. This hampers India’s 2030 renewable energy targets (500 GW capacity, 50% non-fossil share).

Global Comparisons

  1. Many countries (e.g., UK, Germany) have cost-reflective tariff mechanisms and automatic adjustment clauses to prevent accumulation of arrears.
  2. India’s reliance on regulatory assets is unusual, reflecting deeper political economy challenges.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2021] “Access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy is the sine qua non to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).’’ Comment on the progress made in India in this regard.

Linkage: The Supreme Court’s directive on regulatory assets directly ties to SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) by addressing the financial distress of DISCOMs, which undermines both affordability for consumers and sustainability for utilities. India has expanded electricity access impressively, but the persistence of unrecovered costs, delayed subsidies, and non-cost-reflective tariffs highlight the fragility of the system. The judgment pushes for financial discipline, timely subsidy release, and transparent tariff recovery, ensuring that progress towards universal, reliable, and modern energy access is not compromised by systemic inefficiencies.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Foreign Policy Watch: India-SCO

Unmistakable shift (India signalled a change in foreign policy stance at SCO Summit)

Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

Introduction

India’s foreign policy has historically oscillated between balancing great power politics and safeguarding its strategic autonomy. The 2025 SCO Summit in China witnessed a landmark moment: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s first bilateral engagement with Chinese President Xi Jinping since the 2020 military standoff. The visit not only revived dormant dialogues but also underscored India’s shifting posture in a multipolar world marked by U.S. sanctions, instability in West Asia, and contestations within Eurasia.

Significance of Indian Prime Minister’s Visit to China

  1. Seven-year gap: PM Modi had not travelled to China since 2017, making this a major diplomatic breakthrough.
  2. First bilateral since standoff: Meeting with Xi Jinping was the first since the 2020 military confrontation along the LAC.
  3. Three-year SCO absence: Modi’s return to SCO after three years shows India’s willingness to re-engage with a grouping seen as anti-Western.
  4. Optics of bonhomie: Images with Xi and Putin evoked memories of the inactive Russia-India-China trilateral, signalling recalibration.

Revival of India-China Bilateral Engagement

  1. Troop disengagement: Both leaders endorsed the normalisation process initiated in October 2024.
  2. Boundary resolution: Agreed to fast-track talks between Special Representatives.
  3. Connectivity revival: Resumption of direct flights and visa facilitation announced.
  4. Economic ties: Leaders stressed on building trade relations to stabilise world commerce.
  5. Mutual trust rhetoric: Modi stressed ties based on “mutual trust, respect and sensitivity”, while Xi used the metaphor of “Dragon and Elephant” coming together.

External Drivers of India’s Foreign Policy Recalibration

  1. U.S. tariffs and sanctions: American restrictions and mistrust of the Trump administration nudged India to diversify partnerships.
  2. Strategic compulsion: India managed to side-step concerns like China’s support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, UNSC/NSG opposition, and shielding of terrorists.
  3. Multipolar optics: India’s engagement at SCO signals balancing between West and Eurasia.

Key Outcomes of the 2025 SCO Summit

  1. Tianjin declaration: Strong language against cross-border terrorism, including condemnation of the Pahalgam attack (India) and Balochistan attacks (Pakistan).
  2. West Asian crisis: SCO united on humanitarian crisis in Gaza and condemned U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran.
  3. China’s push: Xi proposed an SCO Development Bank.
  4. India’s push: Modi proposed a Civilisational Dialogue among SCO members.
  5. India’s reservation: Continued opposition to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) paragraph.

Missed Diplomatic Opportunities at the Summit

  1. Skipped SCO Plus: Indian Prime Minister did not attend the extended “SCO Plus” Summit, limiting engagement with neighbourhood and Global South leaders.
  2. Regional bonding gap: While optics were strong, substantive regional outreach was diluted.

Conclusion

The SCO Summit underscored India’s willingness to recalibrate its foreign policy in a changing world order. Modi’s visit after years of distance marked a thaw with China, greater Eurasian engagement, and assertion of India’s independent foreign policy despite U.S. pressures. However, missed opportunities in broader outreach and unresolved trust deficits with China remain cautionary notes.

Value Addition

Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO)

Historical Background

  1. Successor to: SCO is the successor to the Shanghai Five, formed in 1996 between China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan.
  2. Formation: Established in 2001 in Shanghai by China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
  3. Expansion: India and Pakistan joined as full members in 2017; Iran became a member in 2023.
  4. Observers & Dialogue Partners: Afghanistan, Belarus, Mongolia, and others engage as observers; several countries (e.g., Turkey, Sri Lanka) are dialogue partners.

Strategic Importance of SCO for India

  1. Geopolitical Balancing: Provides a platform to engage with China and Russia while maintaining ties with the West (Quad, U.S.).
  2. Regional Security: Key forum for counter-terrorism cooperation, especially in light of cross-border terrorism and instability in Afghanistan.
  3. Eurasian Connectivity: Enhances India’s presence in Central Asia, a region rich in energy resources.
  4. Multipolar World Order: Strengthens India’s narrative of strategic autonomy and non-alignment in new form.

Key SCO Mechanisms

  1. Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS): Headquartered in Tashkent, focuses on counter-terrorism intelligence sharing.
  2. Economic Cooperation: Proposals for SCO Development Bank, regional trade, and connectivity projects (though India resists BRI-linked initiatives).
  3. Cultural and Civilisational Dialogues: Shared platforms for people-to-people exchanges, education, and cultural diplomacy.

India’s Challenges within SCO

  1. China Factor: Difficult to expand cooperation given border disputes and China’s Pakistan tilt.
  2. Pakistan Factor: Its membership often leads to diplomatic blockages on issues like terrorism.
  3. BRI Opposition: India consistently refuses to endorse the Belt and Road Initiative, creating friction.
  4. Russia-China Axis: Russia’s growing dependence on China may dilute India’s influence in the bloc.

Contemporary Relevance

  1. Energy and Trade: Central Asia is crucial for energy diversification; SCO provides a gateway.
  2. Geopolitical Flux: With U.S.-China rivalry and West Asia instability, SCO’s role in Eurasian stability gains importance.
  3. Soft Power Opportunity: India uses SCO to promote civilisational dialogue, yoga, Ayurveda, and cultural diplomacy.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2021] Critically examine the aims and objectives of SCO. What importance does it hold for India?

Linkage: The article directly illustrates the objectives of SCO—counter-terrorism (Tianjin declaration), multipolarity, and Eurasian stability. It highlights India’s balancing act—reviving ties with China, opposing BRI, and pushing for civilisational dialogue. Thus, the SCO Summit outcomes reflect both the scope and constraints of SCO’s importance for India in strategic, economic, and security domains.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Global Geological And Climatic Events

Geography uncover why some rivers stay single while others split

Explained | Geography | Mains Paper 1: Geographical Features & Their Location

Introduction

For decades, scientists wondered why some rivers flow as single channels while others split into braided systems. Researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), after studying 84 rivers over 36 years using satellite data, have uncovered the mechanism. Their findings resolve a geomorphological puzzle and offer fresh insights for managing rivers amid climate change, rising floods, and human interventions.

Why is this discovery significant?

The UCSB study shows that erosion, not equilibrium, drives multi-threading. Single-thread rivers balance erosion and deposition, while braided rivers erode banks faster than they deposit, making them unstable. This overturns earlier models assuming fixed depth and width. In an era of extreme weather, such insights are vital for flood prediction, ecosystem restoration, and sustainable infrastructure.

Understanding the dynamics of single-thread and multi-thread rivers

  1. Single-thread rivers: They maintain equilibrium between bank erosion and bar accretion, ensuring stable width.
  2. Multi-thread rivers: They are characterised by imbalance, where erosion exceeds deposition, causing channels to widen and split repeatedly.
  3. Example: Brahmaputra’s braided channels erode laterally at a rapid pace, making them inherently unstable.

Scientific breakthrough in decoding river channel behavior

  1. Data analysed: 84 rivers across climates and terrains, spanning 36 years (1985–2021).
  2. Technology used: Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) on satellite images, generating 4 lakh+ measurements of erosion and accretion.
  3. Outcome: Identification of patterns showing why some rivers remain stable and others split into multiple channels.

The ecological role of vegetation in shaping river morphology

  1. Earlier belief: Vegetated banks were considered essential for meandering rivers.
  2. Stanford study finding: Vegetation alters river bend migration:
  3. Vegetated bends → Move outward, creating levees, limiting sinuosity.
  4. Unvegetated bends → Drift downstream, forming different sedimentary deposits.
  5. Implication: River evolution is not only hydrological but also ecological.

Implications for India’s river systems: Ganga and Brahmaputra in focus

  • Case studies: Ganga near Patna, Farakka, Paksey; Brahmaputra near Pandu, Pasighat, Bahadurabad.
  • Findings: Multi-thread rivers like Brahmaputra are inherently unstable due to rapid lateral erosion.
  • Problem: Artificial confinement by embankments has worsened risks in India.
  • Implication: Flood forecasting models (rating curves) need frequent updates as channel shapes shift.

Nature-based solutions and strategies for sustainable river management

  1. Remove artificial embankments
  2. Restore natural floodplains
  3. Create vegetated buffer zones along banks
  4. Reactivate abandoned channels
  5. Build wetlands in braided sections
  6. Advantages: Lower cost of restoration, better flood absorption, reduced disaster risk.

Conclusion

The new understanding of why rivers split reshapes our approach to flood management, river restoration, and ecological conservation. For India, where rivers like the Ganga and Brahmaputra are lifelines but also sources of recurrent floods, this research is a wake-up call. Emphasising natural solutions over artificial confinement could pave the way for sustainable water governance in the climate change era.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2016] Major cities of India are becoming more vulnerable to flood conditions. Discuss.

Linkage: The recent UCSB study highlights that multi-thread rivers like the Ganga and Brahmaputra are inherently unstable because erosion outpaces deposition, causing channels to split and shift rapidly. In India, this instability is often worsened by human interventions such as embankments, damming, and encroachment, which artificially confine rivers. As these channels change, urban centres located along floodplains (Patna, Guwahati, Kolkata, etc.) become highly flood-prone. The research also suggests that relying on outdated models assuming rivers are stable leads to poor flood prediction in cities. Thus, insights from this study strengthen the argument that urban flooding in India is not only due to unplanned urbanisation but also due to the geomorphological instability of river systems and flawed management practices.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Noise pollution is rising but policy is falling silent

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

Introduction

Noise pollution in India has emerged as a silent but significant public health crisis. With urban decibel levels routinely breaching permissible limits near schools, hospitals, and residential zones, the constitutional promise of dignity and peace is being eroded. Despite a robust legal framework in place since 2000, fragmented enforcement, civic fatigue, and policy inertia have left the issue largely unaddressed. Unlike Europe, where noise-induced illnesses shape policymaking, India remains institutionally and politically silent.

Why is noise pollution in the news?

Noise pollution has resurfaced as a pressing issue because of increasing violations in silence zones, lack of updated enforcement mechanisms, and alarming ecological findings. The Central Pollution Control Board’s National Ambient Noise Monitoring Network (NANMN), launched in 2011 as a flagship real-time monitoring system, has become a passive repository with little accountability. In 2024, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that excessive noise is a violation of Article 21. A 2025 ecological study added urgency, revealing that even one night of urban noise disrupts bird song and communication.

Weaknesses in India’s noise monitoring system

  1. Flawed sensor placement: Many noise monitors are mounted 25–30 feet high, violating CPCB’s 2015 guidelines and recording misleading data.
  2. Data without enforcement: NANMN has been reduced to a dashboard of figures with no link to penalties or compliance.
  3. Fragmented institutions: State Pollution Control Boards, traffic police, and municipalities act in silos, preventing unified action.
  4. Opacity in data: RTI queries remain unanswered, and States like Uttar Pradesh have not released first-quarter 2025 data.

Noise pollution as a constitutional and legal challenge

  1. Right to life with dignity (Article 21): Supreme Court reaffirmed in 2024 that unchecked urban noise directly undermines mental well-being.
  2. Directive Principle (Article 48A): The State has a duty to protect and improve the environment, but silence on noise policy reflects neglect.
  3. Failure of Silence Zones: Hospitals and schools often record 65–70 dB(A) against the permissible 50 dB(A) daytime and 40 dB(A) nighttime limits set by WHO.

Human and ecological costs of unchecked urban noise

  1. Mental health erosion: Chronic noise exposure causes disturbed sleep cycles, hypertension, and reduced cognitive function.
  2. Children and elderly at risk: Sensitive groups face aggravated anxiety and cardiovascular problems.
  3. Biodiversity disruption: 2025 Auckland study shows even one night of noise alters bird song complexity, affecting species survival and ecological communication.
  4. Cultural normalisation: Honking, drilling, and loudspeakers have become ambient irritants, tolerated rather than resisted.

Fragmented governance and symbolic compliance

  1. Weak legal update: Noise Pollution Rules, 2000 have not been revised to reflect rapid urbanisation and logistics-heavy economies.
  2. Institutional silos: No coordination between police, local bodies, and SPCBs, leaving sporadic enforcement drives without systemic change.
  3. Judicial reminders: Despite Noise Pollution (V), In Re (2005, reaffirmed in 2024), state capacity to enforce remains symbolic.

Towards a national acoustic policy and cultural change

  1. Decentralise monitoring: Grant local governments access to real-time NANMN data.
  2. Link data with penalties: Without enforcement, monitoring becomes performative.
  3. National acoustic policy: Define permissible decibel limits across zones with periodic audits.
  4. Urban planning reforms: Embed acoustic resilience into city designs, zoning, and transport planning.
  5. Sonic empathy campaigns: Similar to seatbelt norms, honking reduction must be internalised through community education.

Conclusion

Noise pollution is not an invisible irritant, it is a public health emergency, an ecological disruptor, and a constitutional concern. Without a rights-based framework that treats silence as essential to dignity, India’s urban future risks becoming unliveable. The challenge is not only regulatory but also cultural: fostering a shared ethic of sonic empathy. Silence must not be imposed, but enabled through design, governance, and civic will.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023] What is oil pollution? What are its impacts on the marine ecosystem? In what way is oil pollution particularly harmful for a country like India?

Linkage: Both oil and noise pollution are invisible pollutants with severe but often neglected impacts — oil disrupts marine ecosystems while noise erodes mental health and biodiversity.

Like India’s vulnerability to oil spills due to its long coastline, rapid urbanisation makes it highly exposed to noise hazards. In both cases, regulatory frameworks exist but enforcement is fragmented, highlighting a gap between law and practice.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

J&K – The issues around the state

The importance of India’s federal design

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Federalism

Introduction

India’s federal design is unique, balancing a strong Union with an inclusive representation of States. The abrogation of Article 370 and the downgrading of Jammu and Kashmir into a Union Territory in 2019 raised critical constitutional and political debates. The Supreme Court’s December 2023 ruling upheld the abrogation but directed restoration of statehood. While elections were held in October 2024, the absence of progress on restoring statehood highlights a sharp tension between constitutional intent and political practice. The issue has become a litmus test of Indian federalism, bringing into focus the balance between unity, diversity, and democratic representation.

The Demand for Restoration of Statehood to Jammu and Kashmir

  1. Supreme Court Intervention: Recently, the Court sought a detailed response from the Centre on the timeline for restoring statehood to J&K.
  2. Sharp Contrast: While elections were held in 2024, statehood has not been restored, despite the Court’s explicit direction.
  3. Federal Implications: Critics argue that prolonged delay undermines federalism, part of the Constitution’s basic structure, and weakens democratic rights of J&K’s citizens.
  4. Striking Point: For the first time, a full-fledged State was downgraded into a Union Territory, setting a precedent that challenges constitutional norms.

Constitutional Processes for the Creation of States

  1. Admission: Admission of new States requires an organised political unit; e.g., J&K’s Instrument of Accession (1947).
  2. Establishment: Territory can be acquired under international law, as in the case of Goa and Sikkim.
  3. Formation: Article 3 empowers Parliament to reorganise existing States by altering boundaries, names, or creating new ones.

India’s Federal Design and Its Unique Character

  1. Union of States: Article 1 describes India as a Union of States, signifying indivisibility while denying the right of secession.
  2. Composite Culture: The dual identity of India and Bharat reflects political unity and cultural plurality.
  3. Unitary Tilt: The word Union ensures a strong Centre, but representation of States through the Rajya Sabha balances federalism.
  4. Basic Structure Doctrine: Federalism is recognised as part of the Basic Structure, making it inviolable.

Constitutional Imperatives for Restoring Statehood

  1. Violation of Federal Features: The Union can reorganise States but cannot permanently strip a State into a Union Territory.
  2. Supreme Court’s Directive: In December 2023, the Court mandated restoration of statehood along with Assembly elections.
  3. Representation at the Centre: Permanent representation of States in the Rajya Sabha is essential to sustain India’s federalism.
  4. Erosion of Trust: Prolonged delay risks alienating citizens and eroding India’s image as a welfare-oriented union.

The Road Ahead for Jammu and Kashmir

  1. Elections Held: A 90-member Assembly election was conducted in October 2024.
  2. Centre’s Silence: No concrete roadmap has been shared for restoring statehood, despite judicial directions.
  3. Critics’ Argument: Restoring statehood would empower the elected government, reducing the powers of the Lieutenant Governor, which the Union may be reluctant to cede.
  4. Constitutional Morality: Failure to restore statehood risks weakening the principle of cooperative federalism.

Conclusion

The demand for restoration of J&K’s statehood is not a mere political debate but a constitutional necessity. India’s federal design hinges upon the delicate balance between a strong Union and empowered States. If the Union delays restoration indefinitely, it risks setting a precedent that erodes the sanctity of federalism and weakens democratic representation. Upholding statehood is thus not only about J&K but about preserving the essence of India’s constitutional federation.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2014] Though the federal principle is dominant in our Constitution and that principle is one of its basic features, but it is equally true that federalism under the Indian Constitution leans in favour of a strong Centre, a feature that militates against the concept of strong federalism. Discuss.

Linkage: The recent controversy over the restoration of statehood to Jammu & Kashmir directly exemplifies the asymmetry in India’s federal design. While federalism is a part of the Basic Structure, the downgrading of a full-fledged State into a Union Territory shows the unitary tilt of the Constitution. The Supreme Court’s directive to restore statehood reflects the tension between a strong Centre ensuring unity and the need to preserve the spirit of cooperative federalism, echoing the very debate raised in the 2014 question.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Climate Change Impact on India and World – International Reports, Key Observations, etc.

Data shows seas rising faster around Maldives, Lakshadweep than believed

Explained | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

Introduction

Sea-level rise is one of the most significant consequences of global warming, threatening ecosystems, economies, and human settlements. In the Indian Ocean, recent findings based on coral microatolls suggest that sea levels began rising rapidly as early as the 1950s, decades before satellite and tide-gauge data had indicated. This challenges existing assumptions in climate change studies and raises critical questions about preparedness for vulnerable island states like Maldives, Lakshadweep, and the Chagos archipelago.

Coral Microatolls as Natural Recorders of Sea-Level History

  • Unique natural recorders: Coral microatolls are disk-shaped colonies that stop growing upwards once constrained by the lowest tide, making their surface a natural reflection of long-term sea-level change.
  • Longevity and accuracy: They can survive for decades or centuries, providing high-resolution, continuous data.
  • Study site: Research conducted on Mahutigalaa reef, Huvadhoo Atoll (Maldives), measured a Porites microatoll covering 1930–2019.

Acceleration and Scale of Sea-Level Rise in the Indian Ocean

  • Accelerated rise: Data showed a 0.3 metre increase over 90 years.
  • Rates of rise:
    • 1930–1959: 1–1.84 mm/year
    • 1960–1992: 2.76–4.12 mm/year
    • 1990–2019: 3.91–4.87 mm/year
  • Striking revelation: Sea-level rise began in the late 1950s, not around 1990 as earlier assumed.
  • Cumulative impact: Maldives, Lakshadweep, and Chagos have witnessed 30–40 cm rise in half a century, worsening flooding and erosion risks.

Climate Variability and Environmental Signals Captured in Corals

  • Climate variability: Slow or interrupted coral growth coincided with El Niño and negative Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) events.
  • Astronomical influence: The 18.6-year lunar nodal cycle was reflected in the growth bands, showing tidal and sea-level oscillations.
  • Tectonic stability: Critical factor ensuring that coral growth data reflects sea-level change rather than land movement.

Regional Significance of Findings for the Indian Ocean Basin

  • Above-average warming: The Indian Ocean is heating faster than the global average, amplifying sea-level fluctuations.
  • Strategic gaps: Despite its ecological and geopolitical importance, the central Indian Ocean is one of the least-monitored basins.
  • Regional variations: Coastal areas saw recent acceleration, but the central basin experienced earlier, stronger rise, influenced by shifts in Southern Hemisphere westerlies, ocean heat uptake, and the Intertropical Convergence Zone.

Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Imperatives for Island Nations

  • Existential threat: Infrastructure and communities are concentrated just above sea level in Maldives and Lakshadweep.
  • Adaptation strategies: Understanding historic timing and magnitude of sea-level rise is vital for coastal planning, disaster preparedness, and climate resilience.
  • Scientific value: Microatolls cannot replace tide gauges or satellites but offer a vital complementary tool to refine projections in data-sparse regions.

Conclusion

The discovery that sea-level rise in the Maldives and Lakshadweep began decades earlier than thought is a wake-up call for policymakers and communities. Coral microatolls, silent sentinels of the ocean, have revealed the urgency of accelerating adaptation and resilience measures. As the Indian Ocean warms faster than global averages, the survival of low-lying nations will depend on proactive international cooperation and evidence-based planning.

 

Value Addition

Global Reports and Scientific Frameworks

  • IPCC AR6 (2021–22): Predicts global mean sea level rise of 0.28–1.01 m by 2100, depending on emission scenarios.
  • World Meteorological Organization (WMO): State of the Global Climate 2023: Confirms Indian Ocean warming faster than the global average, intensifying regional sea-level anomalies.
  • UNFCCC & Paris Agreement: Commitments to limit warming below 2°C directly shape adaptation strategies for vulnerable island nations.

Case Studies for Enrichment

  • Maldives: Declared intent to become a carbon-neutral nation by 2030; adaptation measures include artificial islands and elevated infrastructure.
  • Kiribati (Pacific Island): Purchased land in Fiji to relocate populations – showcases climate migration.
  • Lakshadweep Islands: Reports of shoreline erosion, freshwater lens salinity, and threat to tourism livelihoods.

Scientific Concepts for Enrichment

  • Thermal Expansion: Ocean water expands as it warms, contributing ~50% to global sea-level rise.
  • Cryosphere–Ocean Linkages: Melting of Greenland & Antarctic ice sheets accelerates rise beyond thermal expansion.
  • Lunar Nodal Cycle (18.6 years): Natural oscillation in tides influencing local sea-level variability, as confirmed in microatoll data.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has predicted a global sea level rise of about one metre by AD 2100. What would be its impact in India and the other countries in the Indian Ocean region?

Linkage: The article’s findings on coral microatolls show that sea-level rise in the Maldives, Lakshadweep, and Chagos began as early as the 1950s, much earlier than assumed. This reinforces IPCC projections of accelerated rise, highlighting existential risks for low-lying islands. For India and the wider Indian Ocean region, the impacts include intensified coastal erosion, loss of habitats, and the need for urgent adaptation strategies.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Higher Education – RUSA, NIRF, HEFA, etc.

Detoxifying India’s entrance examination system

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Health & Education

Introduction

Entrance examinations in India were envisioned as a filter for talent, ensuring merit-based access to elite institutions. However, over time, they have morphed into an industry-driven rat race. From ₹7 lakh coaching fees to student suicides, the costs are both economic and human. With growing disparities in access, an illusory notion of meritocracy, and mounting psychological toll, rethinking admissions is not a choice but a necessity.

The Coaching Crisis and Its Toll

  1. Massive Aspirant Pool: Over 15 lakh students appear for JEE alone, making coaching almost unavoidable.
  2. High Costs: Coaching fees of ₹6–7 lakh for two years price out poor students.
  3. Early Sacrifices: Students as young as 14 years study Irodov & Krotov (beyond B.Tech level), sacrificing holistic growth.
  4. Mental Health Crisis: Rising stress, depression, alienation; some governments now regulate coaching centres.
  5. Core Issue: The examination system itself is flawed, creating overqualified candidates and distorted merit.

Why Meritocracy is an Illusion

  1. Tiny Differences, Big Stakes: Distinguishing between 91% vs 97% in Class 12, or 99.9 percentile in JEE is unreasonable.
  2. Adequate Benchmark Exists: A 70–80% score in Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics is sufficient for B.Tech readiness.
  3. False Hierarchies: Overemphasis on marginal score differences creates elitism and exclusion.
  4. Privilege Bias: Wealthier families access top coaching, creating an illusory meritocracy.
  5. Philosophical Insight: Harvard’s Michael Sandel critiques meritocratic obsession, proposing lotteries for elite admissions.

Global Inspirations for Reform

  1. Dutch Lottery System:
    • Introduced in 1972, reinstated in 2023 for medical school.
    • Weighted lottery: minimum eligibility required, higher grades = higher chances.
    • Promotes diversity, fairness, and reduced pressure.
  2. China’s “Double Reduction Policy” (2021):
    • Banned for-profit coaching overnight.
    • Reduced financial burden and youth stress.
    • Addressed unchecked growth of the coaching industry.

Proposed Solutions for India

  1. Lottery-based Allocation:
    • Threshold of 80% in PCM for eligibility.
    • Weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%): A weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%) means all eligible students enter a lottery, but those with higher marks get proportionally better chances of selection.
    • Reservations integrated (gender, rural, region).
  2. Rural Empowerment: 50% IIT seats for rural govt school students to promote social mobility.
  3. Coaching Reform: Ban/nationalise coaching, provide free online lectures & study material.
  4. Diversity & Integration: Student exchange between IITs to break hierarchies.
  5. Faculty transfers to standardise academic quality.

Conclusion

India’s choice is stark: continue a toxic rat race that scars its brightest minds, or embrace a fair, equitable system that nurtures youth. Scrapping or reforming entrance exams through lotteries, trust in Class 12 boards, rural reservations, and coaching reforms can detoxify the system. The aim must not only be producing engineers and doctors but ensuring the emotional, social, and moral growth of India’s future citizens.

Value Addition

Committee Recommendations & Policy Inputs

  • Radhakrishnan Commission (1948–49) – Stressed on reducing rote-based entrance exams and aligning admissions with broader educational goals.
  • Kothari Commission (1964–66) – Recommended a common school system to minimise disparities in access, echoing today’s concerns about coaching and inequality.
  • National Knowledge Commission (2005) – Suggested multiple modes of testing and reducing dependence on a single high-stakes exam.
  • Yashpal Committee (2009) – Criticised the “overburden of entrance exams” and highlighted the need for a more holistic, less mechanical admission process.
  • NEP 2020 – Calls for a holistic and flexible education system, moving away from rote-based, high-pressure exams towards fairer assessment models.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2024] What are the aims and objectives of the recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?

Linkage: The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 seeks to curb frauds like paper leaks and impersonation to restore exam credibility. The article extends this concern by highlighting systemic unfairness — coaching dependence, stress, and privilege-driven access. Together, they underline that ensuring fairness in exams requires not just legal safeguards but also structural reforms in India’s entrance system.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Breakthrough

ClassGPT: How AI is reshaping campuses

Explained | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: S&T - Applications In Everyday Life

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly generative models like ChatGPT and Gemini, has become both a boon and a challenge in higher education. Students increasingly rely on AI for assignments, summaries, coding, and even emails, while faculty members grapple with maintaining originality, academic honesty, and critical thinking. With AI growing faster than existing regulatory or pedagogical frameworks, Indian institutions are experimenting with varied approaches, ranging from outright bans to integration into curricula. The choices made today will determine not just the future of learning but also India’s knowledge economy and workforce readiness.

The Changing Landscape of Education with AI

How widespread is AI usage among students and teachers

  1. IIT Delhi Survey (2024): Four out of five students admitted to using AI, often several times a week. One in ten subscribed to premium versions.
  2. Faculty usage: 77% of surveyed teachers used AI for summarising papers, creating slides, or drafting communication.
  3. Student motivations: Simplification of concepts, summarisation of material, mind maps, and scenario simulations.
  4. Concerns: Errors in math, flawed debugging, weak context handling.

The integrity dilemma in classrooms

  1. Blurred lines: Students question whether using AI counts as “cheating” or “time-saving.”
  2. Academic honesty: IIT Delhi’s committee recommended rewriting plagiarism policies to require disclosure of AI use.
  3. Critical thinking loss: Faculty fear students may accept AI answers as “Truth” without questioning them.

Institutional responses in India

  • Policy innovations:
    1. IIT Delhi – integration of AI/ML in curricula, AI workshops, campus-wide licenses.
    2. IIIT Delhi – shifted evaluation to 90% exams, 10% assignments.
    3. IIM Ranchi – evaluation rubric for responsible AI integration.
    4. Shiv Nadar University – five-level “Gen AI Assessment Scale” from prohibition to responsible autonomy.
    5. Ashoka University – AI literacy courses, foundation modules, ethics of AI curriculum.
    6. Strict resistance: Some universities (Delhi University’s Dept. of Education) enforce “No AI” policies, insisting on handwritten assignments.
  • Pedagogical experiments with AI
    1. Classroom integration: AI tools are increasingly used to automate routine tasks like code generation, freeing classroom time for higher-order problem-solving.
    2. Assessment innovation: Institutions are shifting towards interactive methods such as AI-assisted viva voce, project-based evaluation, and scenario testing to ensure genuine understanding.
    3. Ethics in curriculum: Courses on “Ethics of AI” and AI literacy modules are being introduced to sensitise students towards responsible and transparent usage.
    4. Balanced usage: AI is deployed after core concepts are taught, ensuring students retain critical thinking and do not outsource judgment entirely.

Global responses and comparative perspectives

  1. USA: Princeton provides ChatGPT licenses; Oxford mandates disclosure but allows professors to decide; assignments redesigned to integrate AI.
  2. Australia: TEQSA guidelines legitimise AI but require mandatory disclosure; oral exams and viva voce are making a comeback.
  3. UK: Universities pilot TeacherMatic to ensure sector-wide learning models.

Conclusion

Generative AI has irreversibly entered the Indian classroom. The challenge is not whether to allow or ban it but how to regulate, integrate, and ethically harness it. From IITs’ committees to global universities’ adaptive models, the world is learning that AI can either weaken critical thinking or be a catalyst for higher-order learning. For India, the stakes are especially high: with its demographic dividend and growing tech economy, how students learn today will define the nation’s competitiveness tomorrow.

Value Addition

Real-Time Usage of AI in Education

  1. Adaptive Learning Platforms : AI customises lesson plans, adjusting pace and difficulty based on student performance, ensuring personalised learning outcomes.
  2. Automated Assessment and Feedback : AI evaluates tests, essays, coding tasks, and provides instant feedback, saving teacher time and helping students improve faster.
  3. Language Translation and Accessibility : Real-time translation, speech-to-text, and text-to-speech tools remove linguistic barriers, supporting multilingual and differently-abled learners.
  4. AI-Powered Virtual Tutors : Chatbots and digital assistants are available 24×7 to clarify doubts, simulate problem-solving, and provide personalised tutoring.
  5. Plagiarism and Academic Integrity Checks : AI tools detect plagiarism and even AI-generated content, ensuring transparency and originality in student submissions.
  6. Immersive Learning with AI + AR/VR : Virtual labs and simulations powered by AI allow safe, hands-on learning in science, medicine, and engineering.
  7. Administrative Automation : AI automates attendance, timetabling, grading records, and performance monitoring, reducing non-teaching workload for faculty.
  8. Industry 4.0 Skill Development : AI-based coding assistants, real-time debugging, and project simulators prepare students for jobs in data science, robotics, and emerging tech.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023]  Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does AI help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to privacy of the individual in the use of AI in the healthcare?

Linkage: AI’s growing role in education parallels its use in healthcare, where it aids efficiency but raises ethical and privacy concerns. Just as AI in clinical diagnosis demands accuracy, transparency, and accountability, AI in classrooms requires disclosure, integrity, and critical oversight. Both contexts highlight the larger governance challenge of balancing innovation with responsibility.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Disasters and Disaster Management – Sendai Framework, Floods, Cyclones, etc.

Challenges of Monsoon Variability and Disaster Preparedness

Explained | Geography | Mains Paper 3: Disaster Management

Introduction

Heavy rains in August 2025 have wreaked havoc across North India, Himachal Pradesh cut off, Jammu and Kashmir reporting over 40 deaths, Punjab’s farmland submerged, and the Yamuna swelling in the capital. The floods highlight the increasing unpredictability of the southwest monsoon, where rainfall comes in concentrated bursts rather than spread across weeks. Beyond the immediate tragedy, this points to systemic governance challenges, unplanned infrastructure in fragile zones, inadequate early warning systems, and a reactive rather than preventive disaster management model.

Increasing unpredictability of the monsoon

  1. Erraticism of rainfall: Concentrated bursts replace evenly spread rains, overwhelming slopes, rivers, and cities.
  2. Amplified erosion: Short, intense rain accelerates slope destabilisation in Himalayas.
  3. Recurring phenomenon: Evidence now suggests such rainfall patterns are no longer exceptional but likely regular.

Fragility of Himalayan ecosystems and their weakening

  1. Deforestation and clearance: Forest cover removal and road-widening continue unchecked.
  2. Slope destabilisation: Lack of slope-safe engineering increases landslide risks.
  3. Shrinking catchments: Reduced buffering capacity heightens chances of slope failure and siltation downstream.

Insufficiency in disaster preparedness

  1. Early warning gaps: Despite better forecasts, reliable ground-level alerts are absent.
  2. Relief over resilience: Agencies mobilise post-damage; pre-positioned supplies and community drills are missing.
  3. Reactive model: Each disaster treated as unforeseeable, ignoring repeated expert warnings.

Policy choices aggravating vulnerabilities

  1. Strategic projects: Roads and urban expansion pursued in unstable landscapes.
  2. Poor compensatory afforestation: Quality of replanted forests does not match original ecological value.
  3. Climate-resilient infrastructure lag: Development focus prioritises speed over sustainability.

Shifts required in disaster governance

  1. Shift to preventive strategies: Focus on reducing vulnerabilities before disasters occur.
  2. Systematic preparedness: Regular drills, community participation, and pre-emptive relief stocks.
  3. Balanced growth: Infrastructure that respects ecological fragility and integrates climate resilience.

Conclusion

The 2025 floods across North India are not isolated accidents but part of a pattern of climate-driven extreme weather. Treating each calamity as “unprecedented” delays learning and perpetuates cycles of loss. Building resilience means moving beyond post-disaster relief to preventive strategies: sustainable infrastructure, landslide mitigation, community drills, and early-warning systems. Unless governance shifts from reaction to anticipation, monsoon seasons will continue to leave trails of destruction.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2019] Disaster preparedness is the first step in any disaster management process. Explain how hazard zonation mapping will help disaster mitigation in the case of landslides.

Linkage: The 2025 North India floods highlight how slope destabilisation and unchecked construction in Himalayan States amplify landslide risks. Hazard zonation mapping could have guided slope-safe engineering, restricted high-risk land use, and improved early warning. Thus, it directly connects preparedness to mitigation, aligning with the UPSC 2019 question.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Health Sector – UHC, National Health Policy, Family Planning, Health Insurance, etc.

Building health for 1.4 billion Indians

Explained | Social Justice | Mains Paper 2: Health & Education

Introduction

India’s health care is at a defining juncture, balancing between privilege and universal right. The system must simultaneously expand access for millions who remain underserved while ensuring affordability in an era of rising costs. This requires a systemic framework, strengthening insurance, leveraging efficiency, embedding prevention, accelerating digital health adoption, and ensuring regulatory trust. If successful, India can set a global benchmark for inclusive, financially viable, and aspirational health care.

India’s Health Care at an Inflection Point

  1. Dual challenge: Expanding access to underserved populations while making care affordable amid rising costs.
  2. Low insurance penetration: Only 15–18% of Indians are insured compared to global standards.
  3. Huge opportunity: Premium-to-GDP ratio at 3.7% vs global 7%, indicating scope for rapid growth.
  4. Global benchmark potential: India has already demonstrated how high-quality care at scale is possible, an MRI machine in India handles multiple times the scans compared to Western systems.

Insurance as the Foundation of Affordability

  1. Pooling risk: Even modest premiums (₹5,000–₹20,000 for individuals) can cover several lakhs of treatment.
  2. Current gap: India’s gross written premiums stood at $15 billion in 2024, projected to grow at 20% CAGR till 2030.
  3. Ayushman Bharat success: Covers 500 million people with ₹5 lakh per family; led to a 90% rise in timely cancer treatments.
  4. Challenge: Expanding private hospital participation requires fair reimbursements and transparency.

Prevention as the Strongest Cost-Saver

  1. Outpatient costs crisis: Punjab study showed even insured families faced catastrophic expenses for Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) outpatient care.
  2. Redesign needed: Insurance must include outpatient + diagnostics.
  3. People’s role: Preventive mindset across schools, employers, and communities is essential.
  4. Economic benefit: Every rupee invested in healthier lifestyles saves multiples in treatment costs.

Digital Health and AI for Democratising Access

  1. Early adoption: India pioneered telemedicine and now uses AI for sepsis detection, diagnostic triage, remote consultations.
  2. Bridging gaps: Specialists in metros can guide treatments in remote villages hundreds of km away.
  3. Continuity of care: The Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission aims for universal health records accessible nationwide.

Regulation and Trust as the Missing Links

  1. Cost pressures: Insurers may hike premiums 10–15% due to pollution-related illnesses.
  2. Trust deficit: Without confidence in fair claims and grievance redressal, households avoid insurance.
  3. Government push: Finance Ministry has urged Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) to strengthen claims settlement and consumer protection.
  4. Capital skew: In 2023, health sector drew $5.5 billion in private equity and venture capital investment (PE/VC investment), but mostly in metros, tier-2 and 3 remain underserved.

Conclusion

India’s health care future will be shaped by its ability to marry efficiency with equity, technology with trust, and prevention with cure. Insurance must evolve to cover everyday health needs, providers must expand beyond metros, and digital tools must bridge rural-urban divides. With bold public-private partnerships and strong regulation, India can make health care not a privilege but a fundamental right and a global model for inclusive growth.

PYQ Relevance

[ UPSC 2015] Public health system has limitations in providing universal health coverage. Do you think that the private sector could help in bridging the gap? What other viable alternatives would you suggest?

Linkage: The article shows that while India’s public health system has expanded through PM-JAY, universal coverage is still limited by low insurance penetration (15–18%) and uneven rural access, reflecting the very limitations highlighted in the PYQ. It also stresses that private sector participation, anchored in fair reimbursements and transparent processes, is essential to bridge the gap, especially in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Further, it suggests viable alternatives such as preventive health campaigns, digital health innovations, and public-private partnerships to make health care inclusive and affordable.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Primary and Secondary Education – RTE, Education Policy, SEQI, RMSA, Committee Reports, etc.

[28th August 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Play Based Learning for India’s Future

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 2: Health & Education

PYQ Linkage

[UPSC 2016] Examine the main provisions of the National Child Policy and throw light on the status of its implementation.

Linkage: The National Child Policy envisions ensuring survival, development, protection, and participation of every child. Initiatives like Poshan Bhi Padhai Bhi, Aadharshila, and Navchetna operationalise this by transforming Anganwadis into learning hubs and focusing on early stimulation. This reflects concrete implementation of policy goals through structured ECCE and parental involvement.

Mentor’s Comment

India’s vision of Viksit Bharat depends on nurturing its youngest citizens. By placing Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) at the core of policy, Anganwadi centres are being reimagined as the first classrooms, not just nutrition hubs. This editorial highlights the significance of play-based learning, the reforms underway, and their impact on social, economic, and human capital development.

Introduction

Nation-building begins where learning begins, in Anganwadis and playschools where children first explore and imagine. Since 85% of brain development occurs before six, India has prioritised structured, play-based learning. Initiatives like the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, Poshan Bhi Padhai Bhi, Aadharshila curriculum, and Navchetna framework mark a decisive shift: education is no longer seen as starting at school, but from birth itself.

Why in the News?

Play-based learning has become a national policy priority under the present government. Anganwadi workers are being trained in ECCE, and centres are evolving into early learning hubs. This marks a historic policy turn, shifting focus from higher education to the earliest years of life, where investments yield the highest returns. Evidence shows ECCE can raise IQ levels by up to 19 points and deliver 13–18% returns (Heckman), making it one of the most impactful reforms in recent times.

Reimagining Anganwadis as Learning Hubs

  1. Anganwadis as First Schools: Transition from nutrition centres to vibrant learning hubs.
  2. Poshan Bhi Padhai Bhi: A flagship initiative introducing structured ECCE and play-based learning.
  3. Training of Workers: First-ever systematic training of Anganwadi workers in ECCE methods.
  4. Budgetary Support: Enhanced allocations for teaching-learning materials.
  5. Community Trust: Parents now view Anganwadis as the foundation of their child’s education.

Scientific Evidence Supporting ECCE

  1. Brain Development: NEP 2020 highlights 85% of brain growth occurs before six years.
  2. CMC Vellore Study: Children exposed to 18–24 months of ECCE gained up to 19 IQ points by age five, and 5–9 points by age nine.
  3. Global Research: Nobel Laureate James Heckman shows 13–18% returns on early childhood investments.

Ensuring Holistic Development in Early Childhood

  1. Aadharshila Curriculum: National ECCE framework for children aged 3–6 years.
  2. 5+1 Weekly Plan: Balance of free play, structured learning, creativity, motor skills, social interaction, and values.
  3. Focus Beyond Cognitive Skills: Emotional, social, and physical development equally emphasised.
  4. Outdoor Play & Emotional Bonds: Ensuring resilience, socialisation, and value-building.

Birth-to-Three: The Neglected but Crucial Stage

  1. Navchetna Framework: National framework for Early Childhood Stimulation.
  2. Parental Involvement: Empowering caregivers with play-based activities at home.
  3. Equity Focus: State as equaliser for low-income families lacking resources.

Play-Based Learning as a Tool for Nation-Building

  1. Human Capital Formation: Better prepared children ensure stronger productivity.
  2. Social Inclusion: ECCE bridges gaps between privileged and underprivileged children.
  3. Nation’s Future: Early learning reduces dropout rates and improves long-term educational outcomes.

Conclusion

If India is to realise its vision of Viksit Bharat @2047, it must begin where life begins. By making play a policy, and not merely leisure, India is reshaping its future workforce and citizens. Anganwadis as learning hubs, structured ECCE, and parental engagement are steps that will yield dividends not just in GDP growth, but in nurturing empathetic, curious, and resilient human beings. Play is no longer child’s play, it is nation-building.

Value Addition

Anganwadis

  • Scale and Reach: Over 13.9 lakh Anganwadi Centres (AWCs) functioning under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), covering nearly every village/urban ward.
  • Holistic Role: Provide nutrition, health check-ups, immunisation, pre-school non-formal education, and referral services — making them the convergence point for child and maternal welfare.
  • Policy Integration: Central to schemes like Poshan Abhiyaan, Poshan Bhi Padhai Bhi, and the Saksham Anganwadi & Poshan 2.0.
  • Early Childhood Development: With Aadharshila curriculum and Navchetna framework, AWCs are being repositioned as first schools ensuring ECCE and holistic growth.
  • Empowerment of Women: Run largely by women workers (anganwadi sevikas), providing local employment, social recognition, and female leadership at the grassroots.
  • Challenges: Issues of infrastructure gaps, irregular honorarium, workload burden, training deficits, and low community awareness remain barriers.
  • Global Alignment: Echoes UNICEF and UNESCO emphasis on early childhood care as foundational to human capital and demographic dividend.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Promoting Science and Technology – Missions,Policies & Schemes

With Sci-Hub gone, will the ‘One Nation, One Subscription’ scheme step up?

Explained | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields

Introduction

The blocking of Sci-Hub in India marks a turning point in the battle between corporate publishers and the principle of open knowledge. At the heart of the issue lies the paradox of publicly funded research locked behind exorbitant paywalls. The government’s One Nation One Subscription (ONOS) scheme, with an allocation of ₹6,000 crore, aims to democratize access to 13,000 journals for research institutions. Yet, concerns remain about its cost-effectiveness, inclusivity, and long-term sustainability.

Why is this issue in the news?

  • The Delhi High Court’s verdict against Sci-Hub is a landmark moment because:
  • For the first time in India, the judiciary has formally sided with publishers in the long-drawn copyright battle.
  • It stands in sharp contrast with the reality that research is funded by public money but monetized by private publishers with 30%+ profit margins.
  • The problem is enormous: lakhs of rupees per journal subscription make access unaffordable for many institutions, forcing dependence on Sci-Hub earlier.
  • The government’s ONOS initiative is the first large-scale attempt to address structural inequities in knowledge access, but doubts persist about its ability to replace shadow libraries.

The Distinctive Nature of Scientific Publishing

  1. No royalties for authors: Researchers and peer reviewers are unpaid, unlike musicians or filmmakers.
  2. Publicly funded research: Much of Indian science is taxpayer-funded, yet access is privatized.
  3. Exorbitant subscriptions: Institutions pay lakhs for a single journal. Publishers justify costs via “quality control” but enjoy 30%+ profit margins, raising concerns of rent-seeking.

The Global Controversy Around Sci-Hub

  1. Copyright infringement: Courts in the U.S., Europe, and now India have ruled against Sci-Hub.
  2. Essential access tool: For countless researchers, Sci-Hub was the only means to access knowledge, especially outside elite universities.
  3. Contempt charges: Alexandra Elbakyan allegedly violated court orders by running Sci-Net, a mirror service.
  4. Declining relevance: Technical unreliability and growing open-access alternatives are reducing its utility.

The Vision of One Nation, One Subscription

  1. Government-led subscription: Outlay of ₹6,000 crore (2023–2026) for bulk access to 13,000 journals.
  2. Phase I focus: All public institutions; Phase II may include private ones.
  3. Equal access: Seeks to eliminate inequities between elite and smaller research centres.
  4. Limitations: Independent researchers and those at private centres remain excluded until Phase II.

ONOS in the Context of Global Open-Access Movements

  1. Global open-access movement: Over half of papers are already open access through preprints and repositories.
  2. U.S. policy (2026): All federally funded research must be open.
  3. EU Horizon Europe: Similar open-access mandate.
  4. India’s challenge: At a time when the world moves toward open access, ONOS risks becoming an expensive detour.

Structural Flaws in Scholarly Publishing

  1. Dependence on foreign publishers: ONOS continues India’s reliance on Western journals.
  2. Copyright transfer: Indian researchers must still give away rights to their work.
  3. Pay-to-publish dilemma: Funds freed at institutions may shift to open-access journals, but may ignore institutional repositories.
  4. Need for rights retention: Policies like Harvard/MIT (mandatory deposit in repositories) could empower Indian researchers.

Conclusion

The Sci-Hub ban highlights the persistent inequities in access to scientific knowledge. While ONOS is a step forward, it risks being a band-aid solution unless paired with deeper reforms: indigenous publishing capacity, national repositories, and copyright retention policies. India must not merely manage the symptoms of an exploitative system but must cure the disease by reclaiming knowledge as a public good.

Value Addition

Knowledge as a Public Good

  • Publicly funded research must be accessible to all because it is financed by taxpayers.
  • Blocking access (through high subscription fees or court orders) creates an elitist knowledge economy.
  • UN and UNESCO treat knowledge access as a pillar of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 4: Quality Education, SDG 9: Innovation).

Economic Dimension

  • Global publishers enjoy 30%+ profit margins, while Indian institutions pay lakhs per journal subscription, draining public funds.
  • ONOS at ₹6,000 crore (2023–2026) represents bulk negotiation power by the state, saving scattered institutional expenditure.
  • Issue of dependency on foreign publishers persists, highlighting the need for indigenous publishing ecosystems.

Global Comparisons

  • U.S. (2026 mandate): All federally funded research must be openly accessible.
  • EU’s Horizon Europe: Immediate open access to publications funded under the programme.
  • Plan S (Europe, 2018): Publicly funded research must be published in open-access journals.
  • India risks being out of sync if it over-invests in subscriptions while others move to free access models.

Technology and Governance

  • ONOS = India’s experiment in e-governance for knowledge.
  • Needs to integrate institutional repositories, preprint servers, and rights retention policies (like Harvard/MIT) to empower researchers.
  • Can be linked with the Digital India mission, showing tech-driven democratization of services.

Ethical Dimension

  • Applied Ethics of Technology: Corporate profits vs. collective social welfare.
  • Moral dilemma: Should intellectual property rights override public access to life-saving or path-breaking research?
  • Covid-19 demonstrated that open-access collaboration saved lives by accelerating vaccine and drug development.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2024] ‘’What is the present world scenario of Intellectual Property Rights? Although India is second in the world to file patents, still only a few have been commercialized. Explain the reasons behind this less commercialization.”

Linkage: The Sci-Hub ban and ONOS scheme reflect how IPR in scientific publishing creates barriers to access despite research being publicly funded. Globally, publishers extract high profits through restrictive copyright, mirroring the broader challenge of IPR becoming a tool of rent-seeking rather than innovation. India’s weak indigenous publishing ecosystem and overdependence on foreign journals parallel the problem of low commercialization of patents—both highlight the gap between innovation output and practical accessibility/utility.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Addiction, Not Play

Explained | Indian Society | Mains Paper 1: Effects Of Globalization On Indian Society

Introduction

Online real-money gaming is no longer an innocent form of entertainment. With mechanics borrowed from gambling, variable rewards, high engagement loops, and rapid gratification, these games are engineered to create dependency. For India’s youth, this shift has manifested in addiction, financial losses, academic decline, and severe mental health crises. The government’s ban may seem like a safeguard, but the issue is deeper: India’s children deserve not just a firewall, but also psychological care, awareness, and structured support.

Online Gaming Addiction as a Pressing Concern

  1. Gambling-like mechanisms: Real-money games mirror casino psychology, using reward loops to sustain engagement.
  2. Rising cases of harm: Children have drained family bank accounts, hidden debts, and even attempted suicide due to gaming stress.
  3. Mental health crisis: Anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation among adolescents point to an urgent public health issue.

The Fallout of Gaming Addiction on Families

  1. Toxic home environments: Addiction leads to secrecy, conflict, and breakdown of trust.
  2. Academic decline: Falling grades and inability to concentrate fuel further parental distress.
  3. Financial stress: Unexpected credit card bills or loans worsen family relations.

The Limits of Gaming Bans

  1. Immediate relief: Bans reduce household conflicts and financial shocks.
  2. Partial bans & age-gating: Allowing adults while protecting minors can delay addiction onset.
  3. Psychological displacement: Without therapy, children may shift to pornography, substance abuse, or compulsive social media use.

Towards a Comprehensive Strategy Against Gaming Addiction

  1. School-based interventions: Routine mental health screenings and workshops on digital addiction.
  2. Parental guidance: Training parents to spot early warning signs and encourage healthy digital habits.
  3. Child-friendly counselling: Access to therapy services designed for adolescents.
  4. Awareness campaigns: Multi-stakeholder efforts targeting students, caregivers, and teachers.

Gaming Addiction as a Behavioural Health Challenge

  1. Beyond discipline: Punishment or restriction alone worsens secrecy and aggression.
  2. Long-term healing: A behavioural approach can repair family rifts and promote healthy tech use.
  3. Balanced future: Children should grow up with resilience, not dependency, in digital spaces.

Way Forward: Towards a Balanced Approach

  1. Public Health Lens: Treat gaming addiction as a behavioural health issue with school screenings, awareness drives, and accessible counselling.
  2. Smart Regulation: Use age-gating, spending caps, and parental consent instead of blanket bans.
  3. Global Lessons:
    • China: Strict weekly limits → relief but drove youth to unregulated platforms.
    • UK/EU: Regulate loot boxes as gambling → targeted, flexible control.
    • South Korea: Late-night gaming ban + rehab centres → balance of restriction and support.
  4. India’s Path: A middle way combining safeguards with education and digital literacy, avoiding both overregulation and laissez-faire neglect.

Conclusion

India’s youth deserve more than prohibitionist measures. A firewall can block access, but not heal emotional wounds. True protection lies in combining thoughtful regulation with robust mental health programmes, counselling, and awareness. Only then can families find balance and children grow with a healthier relationship to technology.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2023] “Child cuddling is now being replaced by mobile phones. Discuss its impact on the socialization of children.”

Linkage: Online real-money gaming, like mobile phones, is replacing natural child–parent interaction with addictive digital engagement. This weakens socialization, fuels secrecy and conflict within families, and erodes trust. Both highlight how technology-driven dependence disrupts healthy emotional development in children.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Cooperatives at crossroads

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Federalism

Introduction

The National Cooperative Policy, 2025 has triggered a sharp Centre–State tussle, with Kerala at the forefront of resistance. Beyond a policy dispute, it reflects deeper tensions around cooperative federalism, involving constitutional authority, political stakes, and nearly ₹3 lakh crore in deposits, making the issue both high-stakes and nationally significant.

The Current Tussle between Centre and Kerala

  1. Policy provokes backlash: Kerala describes the National Cooperative Policy as “unconstitutional”, asserting that it violates the State’s exclusive authority over cooperatives.
  2. Political dimension: The Left Democratic Front (LDF) government accuses the BJP of attempting to capture Kerala’s cooperative network for political consolidation.
  3. Financial stakes: Kerala’s cooperatives manage deposits worth ₹2.94 lakh crore, making them critical financial entities in the State’s economy.

The Contentious Nature of the National Cooperative Policy

  1. Federalism at stake: Cooperative societies are a State List subject, yet the Centre is asserting influence, reviving concerns first raised during the Multi-State Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2023.
  2. Kerala’s historical legacy: Cooperative institutions date back to early 20th century Travancore, Cochin, and Malabar, and evolved through the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969, making them central to socio-economic life.
  3. Grassroots importance: Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies (PACS) serve as the credit backbone of Kerala’s rural economy.

Kerala’s Political and Institutional Response

  1. Political opposition: State Cooperation Minister V.N. Vasavan termed the policy “harmful to cooperatives.”
  2. Organised resistance: The Kerala Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society association passed a resolution against the policy.
  3. Workers’ unions’ concerns: The Kerala Cooperative Employees Union (KCEU) alleged that the Centre seeks to hand over the cooperative sector to corporates.

Existing Challenges in the Cooperative Sector

  1. Credibility crisis: Several cooperative banks face embezzlement scandals and non-refund of depositors’ money.
  2. Case in point: The Karuvannur Service Cooperative Bank scam in Thrissur dented public confidence and put the State government on the defensive.
  3. State reforms: In 2023, Kerala amended its Cooperative Societies Act to plug loopholes and strengthen safeguards.

Structural Reforms in Kerala’s Cooperative System

  1. Bank consolidation: Merging of district cooperative banks into the Kerala State Cooperative Bank (Kerala Bank) reduced the traditional three-tier credit structure into a two-tier system.
  2. Policy rationale: Streamlining was aimed at improving efficiency and financial stability in the sector.

Future Trajectory of Kerala’s Cooperatives

  1. New crossroads: Accelerated urbanisation, youth aspirations, and sectoral shifts in energy, shipping, technology, and health present opportunities for cooperative diversification.
  2. Future trajectory: The ability of cooperatives to adapt and modernise will shape Kerala’s economic resilience in the coming decades.

Conclusion

Kerala’s cooperative movement, historically a pillar of rural credit and grassroots empowerment, stands at a critical juncture. The National Cooperative Policy, 2025, while framed in the language of reform, has exposed fault lines in India’s federal structure and deepened Centre–State tensions. For Kerala, the challenge lies in balancing its rich cooperative legacy with the demands of modernisation and transparency. For the Union, respecting constitutional boundaries while ensuring financial discipline will be key to sustaining trust in the cooperative model.

Value Addition

Overview of the National Cooperative Policy 2025

The National Cooperative Policy, 2025—officially unveiled on July 24, 2025 —replaces the 2002 framework with a visionary 20-year roadmap (2025–2045) centered on “Sahkar se

Policy Goals:

  • Tripling cooperative sector’s GDP contribution by 2034 through expanded outreach and growth-boosting measures
  • Establish one cooperative unit in every village, and set up 5 model cooperative villages per tehsil, with active creation of 2 lakh new multipurpose PACS by 2026
  • Bring 50 crore more people into the fold, increasing cooperative membership and societal participation

Core Pillars of the Policy: Outlined across six strategic pillars designed to transform cooperatives:

  • Strengthening Foundations
  • Promoting Vibrancy
  • Preparing Cooperatives for the Future (e.g., digitalisation)
  • Enhancing Inclusivity & Reach
  • Expanding into Emerging Sectors
  • Engaging the Younger Generation

Institutional and Structural Measures:

  • Legal & governance revamp: Updated model bye‐laws, regular review mechanisms (every 10 years), and cluster-based monitoring systems for accountability and responsiveness
  • Tribhuvan Cooperative University: A first-of-its-kind cooperative education hub aimed at professionalising the sector and reducing nepotism
  • National Cooperative Exports Limited (NCEL): To enhance global market integration for cooperatives, especially in staples like wheat and rice
  • Leveraging existing schemes: Integration with programs like DIDF, PMMSY, NPDD to establish infrastructure and functional PACS

Sectoral Diversification & Modernisation:

  • New sectors for cooperatives: Including green energy, insurance, tourism, taxi services (“Sahkar Taxi”), Jan Aushadhi Kendras, LPG outlets, CSCs, and more
  • Model Cooperative Villages: Combining dairy, fisheries, floriculture, agri-services, and focused inclusion of women and tribal groups as excellence center

Why It Matters:

  • Policy Revitalisation: First major overhaul in 23 years, indicating the renewed importance given to cooperatives by the government
  • Aligning with National Vision: Anchored in the larger goal of Viksit Bharat 2047, positioning cooperatives as engines of inclusive, rural-led development
  • Digital and Professional Transformation: Emphasises tech adoption, capacity building, and modern governance—crucial in restoring public trust and efficiency
  • Inclusivity at Core: Explicit focus on increasing participation of women, Dalits, Adivasis, and youth—building on the ethos of cooperative empowerment
  • Decentralized Growth Strategy: Village and tehsil-level expansion ensures economic decentralisation and rural integration—a critical tool for grassroots development

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2014] “In the villages itself no form of credit organisation will be suitable except the cooperative society.” – All India Rural Credit Survey. Discuss this statement in the background of agricultural finance in India. What constraints and challenges do financial institutions supplying agricultural finance face? How can technology be used to better reach and serve rural clients?”

Linkage: The 2014 question emphasised cooperatives as the most suitable form of rural credit, highlighting their role in agricultural finance. The Kerala–Centre tussle over the 2025 policy shows how this very grassroots credit system, with PACS and cooperative banks at its core, remains vital yet contested. Thus, the article provides a contemporary case study of both the potential and challenges of cooperatives in India’s agricultural and financial landscape.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Freedom of Speech – Defamation, Sedition, etc.

False righteousness

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Indian Constitution - historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure

Introduction

In a democracy, the judiciary acts as the guardian of fundamental rights, ensuring that executive and legislative actions remain within constitutional limits. However, recent judicial pronouncements urging the executive to tighten controls over online speech raise a worrying question: Is the Court inadvertently enabling state encroachment into constitutionally guaranteed freedoms? This concern is sharpened by the backdrop of the IT Rules, 2021, which already tilt power heavily towards the government in regulating digital speech.

Expanding Powers of the Executive over Free Speech

  1. Judicial Instructions: The Supreme Court recently directed the Union government to frame guidelines on regulating online speech.
  2. Problematic Precedent: Instead of protecting rights, the Court’s instructions risk empowering the executive to expand censorship powers under vague grounds like “misuse of freedom of speech.”

Digital Speech: Between Regulation and Censorship

  1. IT Rules, 2021: These rules already allow the government to flag and order removal of online content, with penalties for intermediaries.
  2. 2023 Amendment: Expanded scope to hold social media companies accountable for user-generated content, giving the state wide-ranging discretionary powers.
  3. Challenge Pending in SC: These rules are already under constitutional challenge, making further expansion questionable.

The Risk of False Righteousness

  1. Distasteful vs. Criminal: While hate speech and incitement to violence are already criminalised, regulating distasteful humour or dissenting opinions risks expanding censorship beyond constitutional boundaries.
  2. Chilling Effect: Citizens begin to self-censor, fearing repercussions for expressing views.
  3. Suppression of Creative Expression: Film producers, directors, and journalists face FIRs and restrictions, stifling art, reporting, and debate necessary for a vibrant democracy.

Judiciary’s Institutional Role under Question

  1. Protector of Rights: The Court is constitutionally mandated to check executive overreach.
  2. Risk of Overstepping: By urging executive rulemaking, the judiciary risks acting like an unquestioned lord in a feudal setup rather than a rights-protecting institution.
  3. Misplaced Priorities: Instead of fortifying existing protections against hate speech, the Court seems to encourage executive expansion into grey zones.

Broader Democratic Implications

  1. Weaponisation of Laws: Governments have a record of using regulations to target political opponents and inconvenient voices.
  2. Threat to Democratic Discourse: An atmosphere of censorship undermines deliberation, dissent, and innovation—all vital for a progressive society.
  3. Global Comparison: Mature democracies often rely on civil remedies and self-regulation, rather than empowering the state to police thought and humour.

Conclusion

The judiciary’s role is not to expand executive power but to ensure constitutional freedoms are protected. Hate speech and incitement to violence are already criminalised; expanding censorship to regulate humour, dissent, or artistic expression risks creating an atmosphere of fear and conformity. The Supreme Court must remember its constitutional role as the sentinel on the qui vive—guarding liberty, not enabling its curtailment.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC 2014] Discuss Section 66A of the IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.

Linkage: The present debate on the Supreme Court urging the executive to frame guidelines for regulating social media echoes the concerns raised in Section 66A of the IT Act, where vague terms led to misuse against free expression. Just like 66A, expanding executive powers risks creating a chilling effect on speech beyond Article 19(2)’s reasonable restrictions. Both highlight the judiciary’s responsibility to act as a protector of rights, not an enabler of censorship.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Electoral Reforms In India

About 30% of MPs and MLAs face serious criminal cases

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Parliament & State Legislatures

Introduction

The intertwining of crime and politics is not new in India, but the recent figures are deeply concerning. An analysis of elected representatives reveals that 31% of MPs and 29% of MLAs across India have declared serious criminal charges against them. More strikingly, in the Lok Sabha, this share has more than doubled from 14% in 2009 to 31% in 2024. Such data points underscore a disturbing trend where democratic institutions are increasingly being captured by individuals with questionable integrity.

About 30% of MPs and MLAs face serious criminal cases

The Scale of Criminalisation in Indian Politics

  • MPs with serious charges: 31% in 2024, compared to 14% in 2009.
  • MLAs with serious charges: 29% nationwide, amounting to more than 1,200 legislators.
  • Definition of serious crimes: Offences with punishments of 5+ years, or non-bailable in nature.

State-wise Picture of the Crisis

  • Telangana: Highest share of MPs with serious cases (71%).
  • Bihar: Second-highest share of MPs (48%).
  • Uttar Pradesh: Highest absolute number of MPs (34) and MLAs (154 or 38%).
  • Andhra Pradesh: Highest share of MLAs with serious cases (56%), followed by Telangana (50%).

Political Party-Wise Trends

  • BJP: Largest absolute number—63 MPs (26%) and 436 MLAs (26%).
  • Congress: 32 MPs (32%) and 194 MLAs (30%).
  • RJD: 100% of its 4 MPs, and 62% of MLAs face serious cases.
  • TDP: 61% of MLAs facing serious charges.

Criminalisation of politics as a Democratic Crisis

  1. Undermines Rule of Law: Representatives sworn to make laws are themselves accused of violating them.
  2. Erodes Public Trust: Citizens lose faith in democratic institutions.
  3. Policy Capture Risk: Legislators with criminal backgrounds may promote laws benefiting vested interests.
  4. Vicious Cycle: Money, muscle power, and electoral compulsions perpetuate the entry of tainted candidates.

Constitutional and Legal Context

  • Representation of People’s Act, 1951: Currently disqualifies convicted representatives but not those with pending cases.

Judicial Interventions:

  1. Lily Thomas vs Union of India (2013): Immediate disqualification upon conviction.
  2. Public Interest Foundation vs Union of India (2018): Urged political parties to disclose candidate criminal records widely.

Conclusion

The latest data underscores that criminalisation in politics is not just persisting but worsening, with more than one in four lawmakers facing serious charges. Unless systemic reforms, ranging from fast-track courts to stricter disqualification laws, are implemented, India risks democratic backsliding. For a healthy democracy, the moral legitimacy of legislatures must be restored.

Value Addition

Issues with Criminalisation in Politics

  • Erosion of Democratic Legitimacy: Lawmakers accused of breaking the law undermine the moral authority of Parliament/Assemblies.
  • Weakening of Rule of Law: Offenders often manipulate investigations, delay trials, and escape accountability.
  • Policy Capture & Corruption: Legislators may pass laws or influence contracts to protect vested interests.
  • Distortion of Electoral Choices: Voters are forced to choose between tainted candidates, limiting free and fair choice.
  • Loss of Public Trust: Citizens lose faith in governance when crime and politics merge.
  • Security Threats: Nexus of politics and crime leads to rise in muscle power, intimidation, and weakens internal security.

Why do Parties Field Candidates With Criminal Background?

  • Money Power: Candidates with criminal networks bring enormous funds to finance expensive elections.
  • Muscle Power: They help in mobilising voters, intimidating opponents, and managing booths in certain constituencies.
  • Winnability Factor: Studies show voters often overlook criminal charges if the candidate is influential, caste-backed, or delivers local patronage.
  • Weak Legal Framework: Only convicted representatives are barred; those with pending cases can contest. With trials dragging on for years, many continue to fight elections.
  • Vote-Bank Politics: Parties use “strongmen” with community backing to secure caste/religion-based votes.

Way Forward with Committee Reports, Judgments & Reforms

Committee Recommendations

  • Vohra Committee (1993): Flagged deep nexus between crime, politics, and bureaucracy.
  • Law Commission 170th Report (1999): Recommended disqualification of candidates once charges are framed in heinous offences.
  • Law Commission 244th Report (2014): Suggested immediate disqualification in cases with charges punishable by 5 years or more, and where charges are framed by a court.
  • Election Commission of India (ECI) Recommendations: Ban on candidates facing heinous charges; fast-track courts to decide political cases within a year.

Judicial Interventions

  • Lily Thomas vs Union of India (2013): MPs/MLAs disqualified immediately upon conviction (earlier they could continue for 3 months pending appeal).
  • Public Interest Foundation vs Union of India (2018): Directed political parties to publicise candidate criminal records widely (website, media, papers).

Suggested Reforms

  • Fast-track Courts: To ensure cases against politicians are resolved within strict timelines.
  • Stricter Disqualification Norms: Disqualify candidates at the stage of framing of charges (with safeguards against false cases).
  • Political Party Accountability: Legal provisions to penalise parties giving tickets to tainted candidates.
  • State Funding of Elections: Reduce dependence on money/muscle power.
  • Voter Awareness: Encourage citizens to reject candidates with serious charges through awareness campaigns.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC GS II] There is a need for simplification of procedure for disqualification of persons found guilty of corrupt practices under the Representation of Peoples Act.” Comment

Linkage: The issue of disqualification under the Representation of People’s Act (RPA), 1951 is central to tackling criminalisation of politics. Recent data showing over 30% MPs/MLAs facing serious criminal charges highlights the inadequacy of current provisions that act only after conviction. Simplifying and strengthening disqualification procedures, as urged by committees and the Supreme Court, is vital to restore public trust in democracy.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Parliament – Sessions, Procedures, Motions, Committees etc

Before legislation becomes litigation

Explained | Polity | Mains Paper 2: Executive & Judiciary

Introduction

The framers of the Indian Constitution rejected the British model of absolute parliamentary sovereignty and instead vested sovereignty in the Constitution. Parliament was given the power to make laws, but within constitutional limits. Judicial review was meant to be a sparing power, used exceptionally when laws violated constitutional principles. However, what was once exceptional has increasingly become the norm. With vague drafting, bypassing of procedures, and lack of constitutional guidance, Indian law-making has frequently ended up in litigation. This trend not only undermines democratic trust but also burdens the judiciary and disrupts policy implementation.

Why is this issue in the news?

The controversy around the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which was challenged in the Supreme Court within days of its enactment, highlights a disturbing pattern. Shockingly, the challengers included MPs themselves, indicating a lack of confidence in their own law-making. The Law Ministry has admitted that 35 central legislations and constitutional amendments were under challenge before the Supreme Court between 2016 and 2022. This points to a systemic crisis in legislative drafting and scrutiny.

The constitutional design of law-making

  • No absolute sovereignty: Unlike Britain, Parliament in India operates within constitutional limits; no law can derogate from the Constitution.
  • Judicial review as exception: The power to strike down laws was meant to be sparing, not routine.
  • Current practice: Courts are increasingly forced into the role of a “parallel legislator” due to Parliament’s failures in precision and scrutiny.

Why do laws end up in litigation

  • Constitutional scrutiny: Laws may violate constitutional guarantees or principles (e.g., Transgender Persons Act, 2019 vis-à-vis Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita).
  • Political theatre: Legal challenges are sometimes used as political tactics by opposition parties or even MPs.
  • Flawed drafting: Vague definitions, incoherent clauses, poor harmonisation with existing laws, and internal contradictions.

Where does the system break down

  • Bypassing procedure: Bills introduced without notice; committees sidelined.
  • Rushed debates: Clause-by-clause discussion often ignored.
  • Poor consultation: Stakeholders and experts not adequately consulted.
  • Dense legalese: MPs unable to engage with overly technical drafting, reducing their role to party-line voting.

The human cost of poor drafting

  • Economic loss: Unclear or contradictory laws disrupt industries and businesses.
  • Social injustice: Unequal punishments (e.g., transgender vs. women sexual abuse provisions).
  • Democratic deficit: MPs are unable to represent citizens effectively when legislation is incomprehensible.

The case for a stronger Attorney-General (AG) role

  • Article 88 of the Constitution: AG has the right to participate in Parliament’s proceedings but rarely invoked.
  • Preventive review: AG can identify constitutional infirmities during debate itself.
  • Non-partisan guidance: AG’s counsel would enable lawmakers to vote more responsibly.
  • Better statutes: Well-drafted laws prevent substitution of legislative intent by judicial interpretation.

Conclusion

India’s constitutional democracy rests on the balance of powers between Parliament and the judiciary. When Parliament abdicates its responsibility of precise and constitutional law-making, the courts inevitably step in, eroding this balance. Institutionalising preventive constitutional review within Parliament, particularly through a proactive role for the Attorney-General, can ensure that legislation serves people effectively without routinely ending up in litigation. A robust democracy demands laws that are clear, just, and constitutionally sound before they leave the House.

Value Addition

What procedural lapses in Parliament lead to flawed laws?

  • Bypassing Committees: Less than 25% of Bills (2019–2023) were sent to Parliamentary Standing Committees, compared to 60–70% in earlier decades. This reduces scrutiny and expert input.
  • Rushed Legislation: Important laws such as the Farm Acts (2020) and the Aadhaar Bill (2016) were passed as Money Bills to bypass Rajya Sabha, undermining debate.
  • Poor Stakeholder Consultation: Unlike developed democracies, draft bills in India are rarely put out for public comments. (E.g., Data Protection Bill, 2019, was tabled without thorough consultation)
  • Clause-by-Clause Neglect: Debates are cut short; MPs often do not engage with technical legal provisions due to lack of time and expertise.
  • Opaque Drafting Process: Drafting happens primarily within ministries with little parliamentary/legal vetting before introduction.
  • ARC 2nd Report (Ethics in Governance): Calls for greater pre-legislative scrutiny and institutional strengthening of committees.

How does flawed drafting affect democracy and society?

  • Judicial Overreach: Poorly worded statutes lead to constant constitutional challenges (e.g., NJAC Act struck down in 2015, Transgender Rights Act 2019 contradictions). The Judiciary ends up legislating by interpretation.
  • Erosion of Parliamentary Sovereignty: Frequent judicial invalidation makes Parliament look ineffective, undermining public trust.
  • Democratic Deficit: Laws in dense legalese alienate both MPs and citizens, reducing informed participation.
  • Economic Uncertainty: Unclear laws discourage investment (e.g., retrospective taxation case leading to Vodafone arbitration).
  • Social Injustice: Disparities in sentencing/punishment (e.g., lower penalties for abuse of transgender persons than for women) perpetuate inequality.
  • Law Commission Report (2008, 210th Report): Identified vague language and excessive delegation as reasons why laws face repeated judicial strikes.

Comparative Perspective

  • UK: Parliamentary sovereignty model; no judicial review of primary legislation, but House of Lords Committees scrutinise bills heavily pre-enactment.
  • USA: Strong judicial review, but bills are subject to Congressional hearings and exhaustive committee scrutiny with expert testimonies before passage.
  • Germany: Has a robust Bundesrat (Upper House) system where laws undergo constitutional and legal vetting before final passage.
  • India: Hybrid system; has judicial review, but Parliamentary scrutiny is weak. Unlike the US/UK, pre-legislative consultation is not institutionalised.

Way Forward

  • Mandatory Committee Review: Make it compulsory for all non-Money Bills to be referred to standing/select committees.
  • Pre-legislative Consultation Policy (2014): Institutionalise it across all ministries with draft bills published in public domain.
  • Strengthening Legislative Research Services: Provide MPs with non-partisan legal/technical assistance (as in US Congressional Research Service).
  • Empowering the Attorney-General: Invoke Article 88 to ensure AG flags constitutional issues during debates.
  • Clarity & Accessibility: Draft laws in plain language versions for MPs and citizens, alongside legal text.
  • Judicial-Parliamentary Dialogue: Structured interactions between constitutional benches and parliamentary committees to ensure harmony.

PYQ Relevance

[UPSC GS II] Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national lawmaker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.

Linkage: The decline in the individual role of MPs as lawmakers, noted in the PYQ (2019), directly links to the article’s theme of flawed law-making. Dense legalese, party whip culture, and bypassed scrutiny reduce MPs’ capacity for meaningful debate. This weakens legislative quality and pushes more laws into judicial review.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Internal Security Architecture Shortcomings – Key Forces, NIA, IB, CCTNS, etc.

How have deception techniques evolved

Explained | Security Issues | Mains Paper 3: External State & Non-State Actors: Challenges To Internal Security.

Introduction

Modern warfare is no longer about firepower alone; it is equally about deception. As precision-guided missiles, drones, and AI-enabled targeting systems grow deadlier, militaries are turning to decoy technologies to confuse radars, mislead missiles, and protect valuable assets. India’s reported use of the AI-enabled X-Guard decoy during Operation Sindoor shows how deception has become a central element of national security strategy.

The Growing Relevance of Deception in Modern Warfare:

  1. Evolving threat environment: Precision-guided munitions, drones, and AI-enabled targeting systems make military platforms highly vulnerable.
  2. Strategic asset: Decoys create confusion, waste enemy munitions, and buy crucial time for retaliation.
  3. Game-changing event: Operation Sindoor showcased India’s successful use of an AI-enabled decoy, termed by experts as “the best instance of spoofing and deception ever seen.”

Inside the X-Guard Fibre-Optic Towed Decoy 

  1. Lightweight & reusable: At just 30 kg, retractable and deployable in flight.
  2. Radar mimicry: Replicates the Rafale’s Radar Cross Section (RCS), doppler velocity, and spectral signature across multiple bands.
  3. 360-degree jamming: Works seamlessly with the Rafale’s SPECTRA suite to form a layered defensive shield.
  4. Operational success: Reports suggest Pakistan’s J-10C fighters misidentified decoys as actual aircraft, wasting advanced PL-15E missiles.

Global landscape of comparable decoy systems: 

  1. BriteCloud (Leonardo UL): Used on Eurofighter Typhoons, Gripen-Es, and some F-16s.
  2. AN/ALE-50/55 series (Raytheon/BAE Systems): Deployed on U.S. Navy F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.
  3. Adaptability to UAVs: Modified for platforms like Israeli Herons and U.S. MQ-9 Reapers.

Battlefield deception on Land Forces: 

  1. Inflatable & heat-emitting decoys: Simulate tanks, artillery, and missile batteries to divert strikes.
  2. Ukraine’s wooden & 3D-printed fakes: Exhaust Russian drone and missile stocks.
  3. Russia’s Inflatech decoys: Create entire armoured formations in minutes.
  4. Indian Army initiative (2025): Issued a request for decoys mimicking T-90 tanks, including thermal and acoustic signatures.

Naval countermeasures and Decoy strategies

  1. Layered naval countermeasures: Chaff, acoustic decoys, and offboard active deception protect against missiles and submarines.
  2. Nulka decoy (Australia–U.S.): Self-propelled system mimicking large ship radar signatures to mislead missile guidance.

Conclusion

Deception, once limited to camouflage and dummy equipment, has evolved into a sophisticated digital-age shield. Airborne fibre-optic decoys, inflatable ground tanks, and naval missile deflectors now define modern survivability. India’s reported use of the X-Guard highlights its adaptation to the evolving battlefield. For a relatively low investment, such systems deliver high-impact protection, proving that in the wars of tomorrow, deception may be as decisive as destruction.

PYQ Relevance

“How is S-400 air defence system technically superior to any other system presently available in the world?”

Linkage: This question shows UPSC’s focus on defence technology and comparative capability analysis. The same lens applies to India’s deployment of AI-enabled decoys like the X-Guard FOTD, which enhance survivability against advanced missile systems. Both highlight the importance of evaluating cutting-edge military technology for national security.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.