💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Archives: News

  • Climate Change Impact on India and World – International Reports, Key Observations, etc.

    Death of Winter in Kashmir: Shrinking Snowfall and Himalayan Climate Crisis

    Why in News

    • A Down To Earth report (March 2026) highlighted that Kashmir has recorded seven consecutive winters with below normal snowfall.  

    Key Findings

    Declining Snowfall

    • Seven consecutive winters with below normal snowfall
    • Winter 2025 to 26 precipitation:
      • Actual: 100.6 mm
      • Normal: 284.9 mm
      • Deficit: 65 percent

    February 2026 Rainfall

    • Actual rainfall: 14.2 mm
    • Normal rainfall: 130.4 mm
    • Deficit: 89 percent

    Srinagar Record

    • Only 5.3 mm precipitation
    • One of the lowest since 1901

    Rising Winter Temperatures

    Record Temperatures

    • Srinagar February average maximum:
      • 15.6°C in 2026
      • Previous record: 14.9°C in 2016

    Gulmarg Temperature

    • Early March temperature:
      • 17.2°C
      • 13.7°C above normal

    Why Snowfall Matters in the Himalayas

    Natural Water Storage

    • Snow acts as natural reservoir
    • Gradual melting feeds: Rivers, Streams and Irrigation systems
    [2023] Consider the following statements: 1 Jhelum River passes through Wular Lake. 2 Krishna River directly feeds Kolleru Lake. 3 Meandering of Gandak River formed Kanwar Lake. How many of the statements given above are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None
  • Capital Markets: Challenges and Developments

    RBI Scraps Treasury Bill Auctions to Boost Liquidity

    Why in News

    • Reserve Bank of India rejected all bids in Treasury Bill auction
    • Government planned to raise ₹35,000 crore
    • Move aimed at boosting banking system liquidity before financial year end (March 31)

    What RBI Did

    • Cancelled auction of:
      • 91 day Treasury Bills
      • 182 day Treasury Bills
      • 364 day Treasury Bills
    • No borrowing by government
    • First full cancellation in 13 months

    What are Treasury Bills

    • Short term government borrowing instruments
    • Issued by Government of India
    • Managed by Reserve Bank of India
    • Zero coupon securities
    • Sold at discount, redeemed at face value
    • Types of T Bills: 91 day Treasury Bills, 182 day Treasury Bills and 364 day Treasury Bills. 

    Why RBI Cancelled Auction

    1. Improve Banking Liquidity

    • Government not borrowing means:
      • Money remains in banking system
      • Banks have more funds to lend
    • Liquidity boost estimated: ₹35,000 crore

    2. Financial Year End Liquidity Needs

    • Banks need funds for:
      • Balance sheet adjustments
      • Meeting regulatory requirements
      • Managing withdrawals

    3. Tax Inflows to Government

    • Government recently received: Advance tax payments and GST collections
    • Reduced need for immediate borrowing

    4. Avoid Market Pressure

    • Higher yields expected in auction
    • RBI avoided: Interest rate spikes and Market volatility
    [2018] Consider the following statements: 
    1 The Reserve Bank of India manages and services Government of India Securities but not any State Government Securities. 
    2 Treasury bills are issued by the Government of India and there are no treasury bills issued by the State Governments. 
    3 Treasury bills offer are issued at a discount from the par value. 
    Select the correct answer using the code given below: 
    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
  • Modern Indian History-Events and Personalities

    Supreme Court: Vande Mataram Advisory Not Mandatory or Threat to Conform

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court stated that the Union Home Ministry advisory on Vande Mataram is not mandatory and does not violate constitutional freedoms.

    Background

    • Union Home Ministry issued January 28 advisory
    • Suggested:
      • Playing Vande Mataram in full
      • At public and ceremonial events
    • Petition filed challenging advisory

    Supreme Court Observations

    Advisory Not Mandatory

    • Court clarified:
      • Advisory is not binding
      • No penalty for non compliance
      • No legal consequences

    Court stated

    • Advisory only prescribes protocol
    • No threat to constitutional freedoms
    • Petition based on vague apprehensions

    Petitioner’s Arguments

    Petitioner argued

    • Advisory makes singing socially mandatory
    • Creates pressure to conform
    • May burden those refusing to sing
    • Playing Vande Mataram before National Anthem reduces anthem’s importance

    Court’s Response

    • No legal burden exists
    • No notice or punishment mentioned
    • Advisory uses non mandatory language

    Example

    • Schools may begin day with Vande Mataram
    • “May” means optional

    Government’s Position

    Solicitor General argued

    • Respect for national symbols should be organic
    • Cited Article 51A Fundamental Duties
    • Citizens must respect:
      • National Flag
      • National Anthem

    National Anthem vs National Song

    Historical Context

    • January 24, 1950 decision
    • Jana Gana Mana adopted as National Anthem
    • Vande Mataram adopted as National Song

    Important

    • Article 51A mentions National Anthem
    • Does not explicitly mention National Song

    Supreme Court Decision

    • Petition termed premature
    • Court refused to intervene
    • Petitioners may approach court if: Discrimination occurs and Coercion happens
    [2011] Under the Constitution of India, which one of the following is not a Fundamental Duty? 
    (a) To vote in public elections 
    (b) To develop the scientific temper 
    (c) To safeguard public property 
    (d) To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals
  • River Interlinking

    Cauvery Basin May Face Water Decline Till 2050 

    Why in the News

    A study by IIT Gandhinagar published in Earth’s Future journal warns that the Cauvery river basin may face a decline in water availability until 2050, unlike most other Indian rivers expected to see increased flows due to climate change.

    Key Findings of the Study

    Decline in Cauvery Water

    • 3.5 percent decline in Cauvery water expected
    • Time period: 2026 to 2050
    • Minimal increase expected after 2051

    Historical Decline

    • Cauvery streamflow declined 28 percent between 1951 and 2012
    • Based on data from Kollegal monitoring station

    Contrast with Other Rivers

    • Most major Indian rivers expected to see increase in flow
    • Projected increases
      • Indus: 25 percent increase
      • Ganga: 8 percent increase
      • Krishna: 16 percent increase
    • Cauvery stands as exception
    [2020] Which of the following Protected Areas are located in Cauvery basin? 
    1 Nagarhole National Park 
    2 Papikonda National Park 
    3 Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve 
    4 Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary 
    Select the correct answer using the code given below: 
    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
  • Climate Change Negotiations – UNFCCC, COP, Other Conventions and Protocols

    India Targets 60 Percent Non Fossil Power Capacity by 2035

    Why in News

    India updated its Nationally Determined Contributions NDC under the Paris Agreement, setting new climate targets for 2035.

    Key Climate Targets for 2035

    Energy Transition Target

    • 60 percent installed electricity capacity from non fossil sources
    • Non fossil sources include: Solar, Wind, Hydropower, Biomass, and Nuclear

    Emissions Reduction Target

    • Reduce emissions intensity of GDP by 47 percent
    • Base year: 2005 levels

    Carbon Sink Target

    • Increase carbon sink to 3.5 to 4 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent
    • Through: Forest cover and Tree cover

    Current Status

    Non Fossil Capacity

    • Current installed capacity from non fossil sources: 52 percent
    • Power generation from non fossil sources: About 25 percent

    Emissions Reduction

    • India reduced emissions intensity: 36 percent reduction from 2005 to 2020

    Carbon Sink Progress

    • Carbon sink created from 2005 to 2019: 1.97 billion tonnes CO2 equivalent

    Forest Cover

    • Forest and tree cover in 2021: 24.6 percent of geographical area
    • National target: 33 percent forest cover

    Earlier NDC Targets for 2030

    India committed to:

    • 50 percent non fossil electricity capacity
    • 44 percent emissions intensity reduction
    • Carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes

    Paris Agreement Context

    • Countries must submit updated NDC every five years
    • India required to submit updated targets by 2025
    • Targets apply for 2031 to 2035 period
    [2016] The term ‘Intended Nationally Determined Contributions’ is sometimes seen in the news in the context of 
    (a) pledges made by the European countries to rehabilitate refugees from the war-affected Middle East  
    (b) plan of action outlined by the countries of the world to combat climate change 
    (c) capital contributed by the member countries in the establishment of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank 
    (d) plan of action outlined by the countries of the world regarding Sustainable Development Goals
  • Civil Aviation Sector – CA Policy 2016, UDAN, Open Skies, etc.

    UDAN Scheme Revamp: Subsidy Extended to 5 Years 

    Why in News

    The Union Cabinet approved a revamped UDAN scheme with ₹28,840 crore outlay, extending airline subsidies and shifting funding to government budget support.

    About UDAN Scheme

    • Full form: Ude Desh ka Aam Naagrik
    • Launched: 2017
    • Ministry: Civil Aviation
    • Objective:
      • Improve regional connectivity
      • Make air travel affordable
      • Develop Tier 2 and Tier 3 airports

    Key Changes in Revamped UDAN

    1. Subsidy Extended

    • Earlier subsidy period: 3 years
    • New subsidy period: 5 years
    • Purpose:
      • Improve route viability
      • Prevent route discontinuation

    2. Funding Shift

    • Earlier: Subsidy funded through levy on airfares
    • Now: Subsidy funded directly from government exchequer

    Why Revamp Was Needed

    • Many routes became non viable after subsidy ended
    • CAG findings: Only 7% to 10% routes viable after subsidy
    • Status of routes:
      • Total routes launched: 663
      • Routes discontinued: 327
    • Airports revived: Total: 95
      • Discontinued: 15 airports
    [2024] Consider the following airports: 
    1 Donyi Polo Airport 
    2 Kushinagar International Airport 
    3 Vijayawada International Airport 
    In the recent past, which of the above have been constructed as Greenfield projects? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
  • Corruption Challenges – Lokpal, POCA, etc

    [25th March 2026] The Hindu OpED: Deepening global corruption as a pointer for India

    PYQ Relevance[UPSC 2016] In the integrity index of Transparency International, India stands very low. Discuss briefly the legal, political, economic, social and cultural factors that have caused the decline of public morality in India.Linkage: The question tests integrity and public morality in governance, a core GS-2 theme linked to institutional trust. The article shows declining integrity through India’s low CPI score (39), reflecting weakened ethical standards and governance deficits.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2025 reveals that global corruption is worsening rather than improving, with the global average dropping to 42/100 and 122 out of 182 countries scoring below 50, marking a sharp deterioration. For the first time in over a decade, corruption trends show systemic decline rather than gradual improvement. The scale is significant: corruption costs are estimated at 5% of global GDP (~$2.6 trillion annually), making it not just a moral concern but a major economic constraint.

    What is the Corruption Perceptions Index (2025)?

    1. The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2025 is published by Transparency International in February 2026
    2. It ranks 182 countries by their perceived public-sector corruption levels using a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). 
    3. The 2025 report shows a stalling global average score of 42/100, indicating widespread corruption, with Denmark (89) ranking highest and Somalia/South Sudan (9) lowest 
    4. Methodology: The index relies on 13 independent data sources, including surveys and expert assessments, to measure bribery, nepotism, and misappropriation of public funds.

    Why is global corruption worsening despite institutional advancements?

    1. Declining Global Average: Indicates systemic deterioration in governance; CPI average falls to 42, lowest in over a decade
    2. Widespread Underperformance: 122/182 countries score below 50, showing weak institutional integrity globally
    3. Reduced Democratic Oversight: Weakening of civic freedoms and oversight mechanisms enables corruption expansion
    4. Shift from Improvement to Decline: Earlier gradual improvement trends replaced by consistent backsliding
    5. Governance-Investment Link: Lower transparency directly impacts investment decisions and sovereign risk assessments

    Why does India’s performance indicate structural governance stagnation?

    1. Stagnant CPI Score: India scores 39 (rank 91); fluctuates narrowly between 38–41 over a decade
    2. Growth-Governance Gap: Economic expansion not matched by institutional strengthening
    3. Comparative Weakness: China scores 42, Sri Lanka comparable; Bangladesh and Pakistan lower but India trails many peers
    4. Missed Reform Momentum: Countries with similar starting points improved through regulatory and institutional reforms
    5. Persistent Institutional Gaps: Weakness in public procurement, judicial efficiency, and regulatory enforcement

    How does corruption impose measurable economic costs?

    1. Global GDP Loss: Estimated at 5% of global GDP (~$2.6 trillion annually)
    2. Transaction Costs: Increases uncertainty and compliance costs for businesses
    3. Resource Misallocation: Diverts capital towards rent-seeking instead of productive investment
    4. India-Specific Impact:
      1. Direct Loss: ~0.5% of GDP annually
      2. Total Impact: 1-1.5% of GDP including indirect effects
    5. Development Trade-off: Losses equal funds required for health, education, and infrastructure investment

    How does regulatory complexity fuel corruption in India?

    1. Compliance Overload: Presence of 26,134+ imprisonment-linked provisions in business laws
    2. Entry Barriers: Example: Pharma unit requires compliance with 998 obligations before operations
    3. Criminalisation of Business: Nearly 49% provisions carry potential criminal liability
    4. Discretionary Power: Complex frameworks increase bureaucratic discretion and rent-seeking opportunities
    5. Cost of Doing Business: Regulatory burden raises operational costs and discourages entrepreneurship

    What role does digital governance play in reducing corruption?

    1. Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT): Reduces leakages in welfare delivery through bank-linked transfers
    2. Digital Payments Growth: RBI Digital Payments Index rises from 493.22 (March 2025) to 516.76 (Sept 2025)
    3. GST System: Enhances formalisation and tax traceability
    4. E-Procurement Platforms: Reduce human discretion in public contracts
    5. Institutional Technology Use: Demonstrates governance improvement through digitisation

    Why is corruption now a strategic economic vulnerability?

    1. Fiscal Inefficiency: Reduces effectiveness of public expenditure
    2. Regulatory Credibility: Weakens investor confidence and sovereign ratings
    3. Social Trust Erosion: Undermines public confidence in institutions
    4. Growth Constraints: Limits India’s aspiration to become a $10 trillion economy
    5. Institutional Imbalance: Rapid economic growth without governance reforms creates systemic risk

    Why should CPI be seen as a benchmark rather than a verdict?

    1. Perception-Based Measure: Reflects public sector integrity perception, not absolute corruption levels
    2. Institutional Strength Indicators: Captures judiciary independence, regulatory transparency, enforcement capacity
    3. Reform Sensitivity: Countries improving rankings show cumulative institutional reform, not episodic crackdowns
    4. India’s Strength Base: Strong democracy, digital capacity, and constitutional framework
    5. Policy Direction Tool: Helps identify governance gaps and reform priorities 

    Conclusion

    Corruption has transitioned from a governance issue to a structural economic constraint. India’s stagnant CPI performance underscores the need for systemic institutional reforms, regulatory simplification, and judicial efficiency improvements. Sustainable economic growth requires parallel strengthening of governance frameworks, ensuring transparency, accountability, and predictability.

  • Judicial Reforms

    When the Chief Justice steps away

    Why in the News?

    The recusal of Justice Surya Kant from the Chief Election Commissioner appointment case is significant because it raises conflict of interest concerns at the highest judicial level, especially in a Constitution Bench matter. The case exposes a systemic gap, India has no codified law on judicial recusal, despite repeated controversies, making this a critical moment for institutional reform.

    What is judicial recusal?

    1. To recuse in court means for a judge, magistrate, or juror to voluntarily remove themselves from a case due to a conflict of interest, bias, or the appearance of impropriety. 
    2. This action ensures impartiality and maintains the integrity of the judicial process, preventing a judge from deciding a case where they have a personal stake. 

    Why is judicial recusal central to natural justice?

    1. Natural Justice Principle: Ensures nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their own cause), preserving fairness and legitimacy.
    2. Bias Prevention: Prevents both actual bias and reasonable apprehension of bias, as seen in evolving jurisprudence.
    3. Public Confidence: Strengthens trust in judicial outcomes by ensuring neutrality.
    4. Case Reference: Manak Lal v. Dr. Prem Chand (1957) shifted focus from actual bias to likelihood of bias. In Ranjit Thakur v. Union of India (1987) the court refined it further stating that, a reasonable apprehension of bias and not merely a remote possibility, justifies withdrawal.

    How has judicial recusal evolved in India?

    1. From Automatic Disqualification to Reasonable Apprehension: Earlier strict disqualification (pecuniary interest) expanded to perceived bias standards.
    2. National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Case Context: In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015), recusal debates arose due to judges’ institutional stakes in judicial appointments.
    3. Justice Chelameswar’s View: Emphasized necessity doctrine, when no alternative forum exists, judges must hear the case despite conflicts.
      1. Doctrine of Necessity:  The Doctrine of Necessity is a legal principle ensuring that, if the only available authority faces a disqualifying conflict, the duty to act takes precedence over recusal. When all members of a body are involved or no alternative forum exists, they must decide the case to avoid a legal impasse
    4. Shift in Approach: Increasing reliance on judicial conscience rather than objective standards.

    What triggered the recent controversy?

    1. Chief Election Commissioner Appointment Law Challenge: Concerns over executive dominance replacing earlier judicial inclusion
    2. Conflict of Interest Concern: Justice Surya Kant cited possible perception of bias due to institutional linkage.
    3. Bench Direction Issue: Oral direction reportedly excluded judges likely to become CJI, raising questions of pre-emptive disqualification.
    4. Repetition of Recusal: Same judge had recused earlier in a related matter, reinforcing concerns about systemic ambiguity.

    What are the risks of discretionary recusal?

    1. Lack of Transparency: No obligation to disclose reasons consistently; creates opacity.
    2. Bench Composition Manipulation: Strategic recusals may influence outcomes indirectly.
    3. Institutional Instability: Frequent recusals in Constitution Bench cases disrupt continuity.
    4. Unequal Standards: Different judges follow different thresholds, leading to inconsistency.

    Does the doctrine of necessity justify non-recusal?

    1. Doctrine of Necessity: Allows judges to hear cases despite conflict if no alternative forum exists.
    2. Application in India: Used in NJAC case where the entire judiciary had a stake.
    3. Limitation: Overuse may dilute impartiality standards.
    4. Balancing Act: Necessity must be exceptional, not routine.

    Why is codification of recusal urgently needed?

    1. Absence of Statute: India lacks binding rules governing judicial conduct in recusal.
    2. Comparative Insight (US): Statutory framework (28 U.S. Code §455) mandates disqualification based on objective criteria.
    3. Self-Enforcement Problem: The Indian system relies on judges themselves to decide, without a review mechanism.
    4. Rising Frequency of Controversies: Repeated recusals in high-stakes cases highlight urgency.

    What institutional reforms can address the issue?

    1. Codified Guidelines: Defines objective thresholds for recusal (financial, personal, institutional bias).
    2. Reason Disclosure Norm: Ensures recorded justification for recusal decisions.
    3. Review Mechanism: Allows limited institutional oversight without undermining judicial independence.
    4. Roster Transparency: Strengthens trust in bench allocation process. 

    Conclusion

    Judicial recusal in India currently operates within a grey zone of personal discretion, creating risks of inconsistency and institutional mistrust. A calibrated framework, balancing independence with accountability, is essential to ensure transparency, predictability, and credibility in constitutional adjudication.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] “Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy.” Comment.

    Linkage: The PYQ examines judicial independence as essential for democracy, including impartiality and institutional integrity. Judicial recusal ensures impartiality, but lack of codified rules creates gaps in transparency, affecting real judicial independence.

  • Pharma Sector – Drug Pricing, NPPA, FDC, Generics, etc.

    How BioPharma Shakti can transform biologics with non-animal models

    Why in the News?

    The Union Budget 2026-27 launched BioPharma SHAKTI with ₹10,000 crore to build a global biologics and biosimilars hub. This marks a shift beyond generic drugs. The article highlights failures of animal models (e.g., 2006 Northwick Park trial), raising concerns in biologics research. It brings focus on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) as part of broader technological and regulatory upgrades.

    Why are animal models increasingly considered unreliable in biologics research?

    1. Northwick Park trial (2006): Phase I trial of TGN1412, a monoclonal antibody (mAb), a lab-made protein targeting specific human antigens, caused severe adverse reactions in humans despite safe monkey testing. Shows failure of animal models in biologics.
    2. Clinical failure evidence: Semagacestat (2022) failed in 457 Alzheimer’s patients despite success in mouse models. Shows poor human translation.
    3. Human-specific action of biologics: Biologics such as mAbs act on highly specific human immune pathways. Animal systems cannot replicate this accurately.
    4. Species-specific differences: Variations in receptors and immune responses reduce predictive reliability across species.
    5. Complexity of biologics: Interactions in human biological systems are multi-layered and not reproducible in animals.
    6. Safety risks: Inadequate prediction of human response increases risk in clinical trials. 

    What are Non-Animal Methodologies (NAMs) and how do they work?

    Non-Animal Methodologies (NAMs) are innovative, human-relevant scientific tools, including computational models, cell-based systems (like organ-on-a-chip), and artificial intelligence, used to assess chemical safety, drug efficacy, or toxicity without animal testing. They work by simulating human biology at the molecular, cellular, or tissue level to provide faster, more accurate, and ethical predictive data than traditional animal studies.

    How do NAMs Work?

    1. In Vitro Systems: Using human cell cultures, organoids, or organs-on-chips (e.g., Emulate’s liver-on-a-chip) to replicate human organ function and predict toxic responses.
    2. In Silico/Computational Modeling: Utilizing computer modeling, AI, and big data to predict how a chemical will behave or interact with biological systems based on known data.
    3. In Chemico/Molecular Techniques: Investigating chemical interactions with molecules, such as DNA or proteins, to assess reactivity.
    4. “Omics” Studies: Using genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to analyze cellular responses, focusing on molecular events rather than late-stage pathology.

    Where are NAMs being implemented?

    1. India: New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2023 enable use of non-animal data.
    2. Global trend: Regulators example in UK are encouraging shift toward human-relevant models. 

    What are Biologics?

    Biologics are complex, high-precision medicines derived from living sources, such as human, animal, or microorganism cells, rather than chemical synthesis. Used to treat diseases like cancer, autoimmune disorders, and rare genetic conditions, they are administered via injection or infusion to target specific molecular pathways. 

    Key Aspects of Biologics

    1. Composition: They are large, intricate molecules, such as proteins, antibodies, or gene therapies, making them much more complex than small-molecule chemical drugs
    2. Production: Unlike synthetic drugs, biologics are “grown” or manufactured using engineered cells in a laboratory, requiring rigorous production monitoring
    3. Administration: Because they are large, delicate molecules that would be broken down by stomach acid, they are given by injection or intravenous (IV) infusion
    4. Mechanism: They are targeted therapies, designed to interact with specific parts of the immune system or other biological pathways to treat conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and psoriasis.

    How does BioPharma SHAKTI aim to transform India’s biologics sector?

    1. Domestic manufacturing push: Strengthens local production of biologics and biosimilars.
    2. Innovation ecosystem: Supports development of advanced human-relevant models.
    3. Cost efficiency: Reduces drug development costs by 10-26% (2019 analysis).
    4. Time reduction: Shortens lead optimization timelines by ~15%.
    5. Global competitiveness: Positions India as a hub for next-generation drug development. 

    What are the economic and regulatory challenges in adopting NAMs?

    1. High infrastructure costs: Requires investment of ₹10,000 crore under BioPharma SHAKTI.
    2. Patent barriers: Extended exclusivity (e.g., trastuzumab case) delays biosimilar entry until 2018.
    3. Regulatory lag: CDSCO approvals based on outdated guidelines.
    4. Validation challenges: Lack of standardized protocols for NAMs.
    5. Investor hesitation: Limited risk appetite in emerging technologies. 

    How can NAMs improve efficiency and outcomes in drug development?

    1. Precision medicine: Enables patient-specific testing using human cells.
    2. Reduced attrition rates: Improves success rates in clinical trials.
    3. Ethical compliance: Aligns with global shift toward cruelty-free testing.
    4. Faster approvals: Reliable data accelerates regulatory processes.
    5. Better disease modelling: Particularly useful for complex diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s. 

    Why is regulatory reform crucial for the success of BioPharma SHAKTI?

    1. Policy alignment: Ensures NAMs are integrated into approval frameworks.
    2. Guideline modernization: Updates CDSCO standards for emerging technologies.
    3. Validation systems: Establishes independent validation mechanisms.
    4. Industry confidence: Encourages investment and adoption.
    5. Global harmonization: Aligns India with EU and US regulatory practices. 

    Conclusion

    BioPharma SHAKTI represents a paradigm shift toward human-centric drug development. Its success depends on regulatory reforms, investment, and industry collaboration. Transitioning from animal models to NAMs enhances safety, efficiency, and ethical compliance, positioning India as a leader in biologics innovation.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] Why is there so much activity in the field of biotechnology in our country? How has this activity benefitted the field of biopharma?

    Linkage: This PYQ highlights growth of biotechnology in driving biopharma innovation, biologics, and advanced drug development systems. BioPharma SHAKTI and shift to human-relevant models (NAMs) reflect this transition toward more reliable and modern biopharmaceutical research.

  • Agricultural Sector and Marketing Reforms – eNAM, Model APMC Act, Eco Survey Reco, etc.

    National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture NICRA

    Why in News

    Government released data under National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture NICRA showing 310 districts vulnerable to climate change and expansion of climate resilient farming technologies across India.

    About NICRA

    • Implemented by Indian Council of Agricultural Research ICAR
    • Objective: Climate resilient agriculture and food security
    • Focus:
      • Climate risk assessment
      • Adaptation technologies
      • Farmer capacity building
      • Climate resilient crop varieties

    Key Findings

    Climate Risk Assessment

    • Total districts assessed: 651 agricultural districts
    • Vulnerable districts: 310 districts
      • Very high vulnerability: 109 districts
      • High vulnerability: 201 districts
    • Assessment based on IPCC protocols

    District Agriculture Contingency Plans

    • Prepared for 651 districts
    • Aim:
      • Handle extreme weather
      • Recommend climate resilient crops
      • Provide location specific farming practices

    Climate Resilient Villages

    • 448 Climate Resilient Villages
    • Located in 151 vulnerable districts
    • Implemented through Krishi Vigyan Kendras KVKs

    Crop Variety Development

    • 2900 crop varieties released during 2014 to 2024
    • 2661 varieties climate tolerant
    • Resistant to: Drought, Flood, Heat, and Pests

    Role of Krishi Vigyan Kendras

    • Total KVKs: 731
    • Farmers trained: 18.56 lakh
    • Promote climate resilient technologies

    Use of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture

    Kisane Mitra AI Chatbot

    • Voice based AI
    • Supports 11 languages
    • Handles 20,000 queries daily
    • Total responses: 95 lakh queries

    Bharat VISTAAR Platform

    • AI powered advisory platform
    • Provides:
      • Weather updates
      • Market rates
      • Scheme information
    • 24×7 AI assistant Bharati
    • Currently supports Hindi and English

    National Pest Surveillance System

    • Uses AI and Machine Learning
    • Covers:
      • 61 crops
      • 400 pests
    • Used by 10,000 extension workers

    Kisan Sarathi Platform

    • Digital advisory platform
    • Registered farmers: 2.75 crore
    • Coverage: 3.43 lakh villages
    [2021] In the context of India’s preparation for Climate-Smart Agriculture, consider the following statements: 1 The ‘Climate-Smart Village’ approach in India is a part of a project led by the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), an international research program. 2 The project of CCAFS is carried out under the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), headquartered in France. 3 The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in India is one of the CGIAR’s research centers. Which of the statements given above are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2, and 3

Join the Community

Join us across Social Media platforms.